First of all, you can't throw out 2007 just because it doesn't suit you. Alabama is 4-3 against Auburn under Nick Saban. If you're going to toss that loss, toss the win over Tennessee that same year while you're at it. I bet you won't do that.
You do, however, bring up a pretty good point about the AU series -- "other than the Bryant era." It was scarcely a month ago that the discussion was over who the best Alabama coach of all time was. Domination in a rivalry series is probably part of that discussion.
A win this past Saturday, and Saban is 5-2 and tied with Gene Stallings with better than a .700 win percentage in the series. Then we're not having this discussion -- because Alabama wouldn't have been upset by its in-state rival, and would be playing for a conference title. Separate from the fact that the game happened to be against Auburn, the simple fact that this is the 12th game of the year makes it more important than the second or third game of the year, because losing it does more damage to your ability to play for titles. A record of 4-3 in ... let's call it "the regular season finale" to get Auburn out of the discussion entirely ... means Alabama is not "finishing." Hence the title of the column.
I'm not throwing out 2007 simply because it suits me. CNS lost to Sylvester Croom, and Louisana Monroe that year, and squeaked by Houston and Colorado, so that year is not indicative of the kind of coach CNS is. Yeah sure, its part of the overall record, but that year is nothing like the run we've been on since then.
As far as wins, championships, and overall accomplishments, Coach Bryant has a resume that will never be equaled. He dominated AU in a way that no one was ever done. You say that domination in a rivalry series matters in when talking about Alabama's best coach ever, and I agree with that. OTOH, Coach Bryant never beat Texas or Notre Dame and lost bowl games in '64 and '73 that would have cost NC's in today's rules. From '67 - '74 Coach Bryant went on a 8 year winless streak in bowls (0-7-1 record). His overall bowl record here was 12-10-2. Other than the series with AU, is it fair to say CNS has finished much better than Coach Bryant so far?
Time has a way of making things either look better or worse than they actually are. CNS has accomplished what he has in a much more competitive era, with much more limitations than Coach Bryant ever did. Its looking more and more to me what CNS has accomplished here won't be truly be appreciated by a lot of people until it is over.
Now, do I think we finished this year? Absolutely not. Do I think we should have won this game? Yes I do. However, it is not something I am going to dwell on or let define how I feel about CNS.
One play being different could have changed this game, and we're talking about MIZZ right. Last year against UGA or in 2009 against Tennessee we made that one play. This year against AU we didn't. That's just how close these things come down to sometimes. If we got blown out, or even physically whipped, I may agree with you that CNS is not preparing our players properly for the Iron Bowl or not getting how important this rivarly is. But when we were gain over 100 yards more than they do and lose because we miss 4 FG's, players drop balls, AJ misses open receivers, and because defensive players that are in postion to make plays miss tackles and blow assignments, I can't put that all on him.