Yeah. Too bad we didn't' get Texas that late in the season.Top of my head, KY over Louisville might be the most impressive SEC OOC win in 2023. SMH
Yeah. Too bad we didn't' get Texas that late in the season.Top of my head, KY over Louisville might be the most impressive SEC OOC win in 2023. SMH
I would have easily ranked TCU third last year. They only lost their championship game, which was an extra game that Ohio St. did not have to play. OSU also got beaten down on their home field by Michigan; whereas, TCU lost a very close game. I would have debated about the number four spot between OSU and Bama, and I really don't think either one deserved to be there last year, but they had to pick one of them because all of the other teams dropped like flies. It is clear that people have different opinions about last year, and that is just fine.Either you rank the team where they deserve to be, or you have no right ranking them in the first place.
I think the point is that it was a two score game. Would it be better if people said two score game? Either way, they were very much in control at the end of the game.This phrase has become a pet peeve of mine. I'm not directing this at you and it's also technically correct, but it's almost like it's designed to make the Texas loss sound worse than it was. Sure, 10 points means "double digits," but just barely. So is 99.
Personally, I would prefer just "lost by 10 points." It's factual and specific. "Double digits" just sounds like it's intended to make the loss sound worse than it was.I think the point is that it was a two score game. Would it be better if people said two score game? Either way, they were very much in control at the end of the game.
I've always had the position that it's very problematic to replace coordinators. Some people seem to think you can change coordinators constantly with no adverse results. It causes a lot of issues. I brought that up over and over in the Hurts discussion and here as well since Alabama was breaking in not one, but two new coordinators.Whew...how does it all go back to your position on Jalen Hurts??? I just stopped reading right there, honestly.
Given the fact that we play Oklahoma, Texas, and Georgia - among our other usual SEC foes - next year, I agree.Exactly! This committee has told everyone that having a tough schedule is pointless. Just play and dominate inferior teams and you are in like Flinn. Other teams with the exact same record and tougher schedules need not apply.
THAT is the full intention of the statement. I've said it prior, and I'll say it again. This committee has postured itself with their preferred games and that's what they'll get reasoning be damned!Personally, I would prefer just "lost by 10 points." It's factual and specific. "Double digits" just sounds like it's intended to make the loss sound worse than it was.
The CFP criteria include not "incenting [sic ] margin of victory." Granted, this is with respect to common opponents, but that makes it nonsensical to weigh margin of victory against differing opponents (who, by definition, are of different quality). So if this is what they are saying, they are actually going against an explicit selection criterion...Yes, last night Rece asked him about Oregon's schedule being ranked below all other 1 loss teams and the shill said roughly "yes but they dominated their opponents". That is the only argument they have that favors Oregon and they want them in so that is what they are using.
Inserting criteria based on margin of victory over common opponents is a non-sensical. Oregon beat Texas Tech by 7 in September......Texas beat Texas Tech by 50 in November. You start doing that you might as well start doing hypotheticals like, how bad does November Bama beat September Bama. How bad does November Georgia beat September Washington.....you could go on and on.The CFP criteria include not "incenting [sic ] margin of victory." Granted, this is with respect to common opponents, but that makes it nonsensical to weigh margin of victory against differing opponents (who, by definition, are of different quality). So if this is what they are saying, they are actually going against an explicit selection criterion...
good. i hope he keeps running his mouth
LOL they have more turnovers than we do this year. Dude is the dumbest.
POLITICS!!!He didn’t even answer the question, what a joke this has turned into.
Since he is unemployed , I wonder if he’s paid by the REC to spread rat poison.LOL they have more turnovers than we do this year. Dude is the dumbest.
He is a liar.LOL they have more turnovers than we do this year. Dude is the dumbest.
Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.