Game Thread: Baylor vs Oklahoma

[DzynKingRTR]

game on fox sports 1


I think Baylor loses this one.

 

[CrimsonForce]

Bet Baylor doesn't score 70 this game. Funny how when one of these teams that score an absurd amount of points play a defense with a pulse they generally look pretty average. Seastrunk for Baylor is legit though...

 

[crimson fan man]

Baylor's defense looks better then the offense.

 

[rolltideallday]

I hope Fox Sports One never has a big game again

 

[rolltideallday]

Baylor's defense looks better then the offense.

Has Oklahoma even attempted a pass over 5 yards?

 

[BamaJama17]

I don't think that was targeting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[lelandhorne]

What a joke these refs are.

 

[crimsonaudio]

That was targeting. If you are willing to go that high, be prepared to sit.

 

[DzynKingRTR]

I don't think that was targeting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wow Oklahoma just got a huge gain due to multiple penalties.

 

[REBELZED]

I don't think that was targeting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I hate the targeting call as much as anybody, but I think that one was pretty cut and dry. Gotta go lower there.

 

[lelandhorne]

I hate the targeting call as much as anybody, but I think that one was pretty cut and dry. Gotta go lower there.

How's he supposed to go lower in that time frame? If he had gone lower all he'd have accomplished is a helmet to helmet hit.

 

[BamaJama17]

Also BTW those are some ugly uniforms Baylor is wearing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[257WBY]

Would've been very hard to go low that quick.

 

[BamaJama17]

How's he supposed to go lower in that time frame? If he had gone lower all he'd have accomplished is a helmet to helmet hit.

Exactly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[BamaJama17]

I hate the targeting call as much as anybody, but I think that one was pretty cut and dry. Gotta go lower there.

Yeah go lower if he was any smaller.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CrimsonNagus]

That is not targeting. The receiver is the one who went low by bending over, if he hadn't done that it would have been a normal hit. The receiver did more targeting then the DB.

Every receiver is defenseless when they catch the ball, this rule is ridiculous and needs to be eliminated. That was a football play that resulted in knocking the ball loose. Any other year then this year, we would praise that hit. This is the dumbest rule ever.

 

[REBELZED]

How's he supposed to go lower in that time frame? If he had gone lower all he'd have accomplished is a helmet to helmet hit.

Like I said, I'm against the targeting ejection rule, but that one was a lot less "bang bang" than most of them have been. The DB saw that play developing which is why he was in position to make the tackle. He had a lot more time to go low than players do on most tackles IMO.

 

[DzynKingRTR]

while not targeting, he did kind of throw his forearm into the guy and knocked him out of the game.

 

[CrimsonNagus]

The receiver lowered his body just before the hit, if he hadn't done that then it would have just been a good tackle. It's the receivers fault IMO.

In years past that wouldn't have even drawn a flag. We use to call that a tackle. What a joke.

 

[TideMom2Boys]

Why didn't Fox show the penalties on that Dixon kid. It cost them a ton of yards.