Consolidated O-Line discussion - where has the 24-25 team been, and what do we think the goal is for 26?

gtgilbert

All-American
Aug 12, 2011
4,364
8,033
187
With all the discussion about CKD wanting a lighter, quicker, more agile OL, I wondered what does that really mean, and also what are the indications that we're really working toward that goal? also, do we think it would be effective?

Looking at the 2023 UW starters who won the Joe Moore award, only Brailsford was under 300. They also got completely thrashed by UM in the championship game. Even with Brailsford, they averaged 306

The smallest starter for IU this season was 309 and they averaged 311 and were pretty consistent between 310 and 315. Even their depth players were mostly in this range. two guys are 6'4", 4 at 6'5" and 4 are 6'6".

Bama has proctor tipping the scales at one end, but brailsford on the complete opposite so our average is kinda meaningless at 327, so what about who CKD has brought in and how players have evolved - gaining or losing weight in the offseason.

First transfers in were GVDM and Brailsford. VDM came in in the 320's, and has stayed there gaining a couple pounds. Brailsford gained a good bit of weight but is still undersized. This signing class was mostly Saban recruits - Ionata, Sanders, Poe. that said, all were under 300 when signed, so maybe Saban wasn't all in on the massive guys anyway. Poe gained the most up to 318 first year and added two more to 320. Ionata moved up to 310 then down to 306 and Sanders also hit 310, but then lost down to 308.

Next season, we brought in Dewberry, who was over 340 and Anugwon at around 330. Not exactly getting smaller... Dewberry lost 13 pounds down to 332 - still kinda a bigger guy.

The signing class OL was Carroll listed at 315, Llyod at 280. Debose at 335, Waldrop at 325. Carroll put on weight up to 321, Lloyd gained to 310 by by spring, then 318 by fall camp. Debose slimmed down to 319 and Waldrop was pretty steady down to 324.

Incoming class: Cooley at 315, Doughty at 300, Booker at 285, Miller at 305 and Fretwell at 295. So slightly lighter than the prior class, but we don't know what they'll do on campus, and this group also isn't as highly rated as the prior one. ALL these guys have a lot of length, other than Booker though.

Saban generally had prototypes for positions, and pretty much every offseason you could see guys at a position all moving in a general direction toward that. It would sometimes change as the game changed, and there could be exceptions, but the trend was usually there. For example, ILBs were McClain/Hightower types, but then changed to be foster/mosely/moses types as more speed was needed.

Does CKD have the same philosophy and what does that mean on the OL?

If he does, I can't really figure it out based on the players he's brought in, and how weights are moving around.

Most guys over the last couple of years appear to be targeting low-mid 320s, and that's where Saban era guys like Roberts, Formby and Alinen generally ended up as well, but then guys like Sanders dropped weight to under 310.

The only trend I see in the signing class is length - we're clearly prioritizing 6'4" plus guys.

So what's the thought? What exactly does "smaller" look like on the OL for CKD? I think we all know it's not Proctor, but it also doesn't appear to be Brailsford.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dathbama
Maybe not "smaller" but "quicker" or, just better athletes???
I should definitely switch to using “agile “, because I have no doubt that if Proctor moved like he was 300 pounds we would take ten of him.

These guys are just a tad slow and need better technique. So it’s time for discussions about the line coach and S&C.

Evaluation probably needs a look as well.
 
We would do well to mimic what the NFL wants in an OL. Playing with type player the NFL doesnt want will cripple recruiting and ultimately competitiveness.

I just dont think we spent any money on our OL except for Proctor. Formby ain't going anywhere, his grandparents are bigger contributors to our NIL amd were integral in getting Proctor back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolBreeze
Just look at the Indiana line if you want to see an example of what we need. Those guys didn't seem overly large. We couldn't do anything effectively against them and they worked flawlessly together. They also mastered the art of holding but not by enough to draw a flag. Let me flatly state that if we had Indiana's line we would be the ones talked about as the favorite to win the NC.
 
Just look at the Indiana line if you want to see an example of what we need. Those guys didn't seem overly large. We couldn't do anything effectively against them and they worked flawlessly together. They also mastered the art of holding but not by enough to draw a flag. Let me flatly state that if we had Indiana's line we would be the ones talked about as the favorite to win the NC.
ok - so the guys we are looking for are 6'5"+, 315-320(ish).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexanderFan
hope they make OL coach change early so that the lineman who are thinking of transferring can be evaluated by new coaches before their decision
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bhammer
The first thing is getting an OL coach in there who can actually get players to play better. Not someone who may have a lot of knowledge about the OL but doesn't have the capability to coach it into players.

I'm not as concerned about "being big" as long as the athlete has good quick twitch lateral movement and isn't slow twitched.

Third, is strength and power. We cant get physically beaten at the LOS which happened a lot this season. S&C has to be evaluated because there is a point where good technique cant overcome the other guy being that much stronger.
 
Best OL in football this year? Iowa of all places...Snrs and Grad students + a sprinkling of others...Vandy...5 and 6 year players -UI....4 and 5 year jr/sr players....experience, understanding of blocking schemes, maturity and years in the weight room....its a formula for success...I hope we see that and bring in that type of experience.
 
isnt that same as what cns targeted?

i saw somewhere that IU line was lighter ... looks like its not

That's kinda the point. Our OT's over the last 6 years have mostly been in that range. The exceptions were JC latham at 340+, but he also had an elite level LOW body fat and Evan Neal, who while not as lean at latham, also didn't carry bad weight.

The 'bigger' guys were landon Dickerson and Tyler Booker who both were very successful and pretty mobile and I am sure we would want more guys just like them back

The 2021 OL averaged 312; 22 was 307. 23 went up to 328 as we added Proctor and had Latham at his heaviest and Booker was a bit bigger then. Roberts was 315 and Seth was just over 300. Booker also trimmed down to the mid 320s by end of season and was pretty mobile even at the bigger weight.

We're just slightly bigger (taking Proctor out since he's such an outlier) now. IMHO when we have had issues recently, it's been more due to lack of length than being oversized (again, other than proctor). I think we've just gotten so focused on how immobile proctor can be at times due to his oversized nature, that it became the narrative.
 
The issues with the line under late Saban/ KDB imo are:

1. Evaluation/Development issues.

21 Class
Latham - Obviously great. Only 3 years.
B. Brockermeyer - Starting C at Miami.
T. Brockermeyer - Retired .
TJ Fergueson - Syracuse starting LG.
J. Roberts - Rotational IOL.

22 Class
E. Pritchett - Starting LT for Nebraska.
Booker - 3 years for a reason.

23 Class
Proctor - Starting LT.
Alinen- Backup.
Formby - Starter.
McVay - Backup RT for North Carolina.
Montgomery- Portal.

24 Class
Poe - 3rd String IOL.
Sanders - Backup IOL
Sonata - 3rd C.

25 Class
Carroll - Starting RT.
Lloyd - Backup LT.
Waldrep - Backup.

Two homeruns in 5 years(Booker and Latham). Proctor slots multiple slots below both of these guys IMO. I root for Formby but he has been a liability to this point. Carroll should be at OG but the need at RT got him on the field IMO.

The 21 class has 2 starters at other schools. The 22 class is gone. 23 has been underwhelming and 24 is a bust to this point. 25 could be the key with Carroll and hopefully Lloyd. The truth is, we all know that the last few Saban years were a bust in terms of line play.

We have hit some homeruns but have a serious issue with singles and doubles.

2. Fit.

It's hard to even make judgements on what works and doesn't simply because the line is a mismatch of ill-fitting parts. We have guys with road grading size but missing the required athleticism and then we have a center who looks like an incoming freshman. There are no complimentary pieces and it was embarrassing all season. If you take out the Eastern Illinois and LA Monroe games, we averaged under 3 yards per carry on the season. Absolutely crazy.

3. Scheme
I am sorry but the lack of creativity was bad. What's worse is how incredibly predictable the running game was. When the answer to 4th and 1 is a handoff to Bernard, the question had no chance of being answered. How many other WRs did we run those sweeps for? It was painfully predictable.

Moving forward, there is talent still here but I see little immediate help from the incoming freshman. There needs to be some serious attention to fixing the line.
 
The issues with the line under late Saban/ KDB imo are:

1. Evaluation/Development issues.

21 Class
Latham - Obviously great. Only 3 years.
B. Brockermeyer - Starting C at Miami.
T. Brockermeyer - Retired .
TJ Fergueson - Syracuse starting LG.
J. Roberts - Rotational IOL.

22 Class
E. Pritchett - Starting LT for Nebraska.
Booker - 3 years for a reason.

23 Class
Proctor - Starting LT.
Alinen- Backup.
Formby - Starter.
McVay - Backup RT for North Carolina.
Montgomery- Portal.

24 Class
Poe - 3rd String IOL.
Sanders - Backup IOL
Sonata - 3rd C.

25 Class
Carroll - Starting RT.
Lloyd - Backup LT.
Waldrep - Backup.

Two homeruns in 5 years(Booker and Latham). Proctor slots multiple slots below both of these guys IMO. I root for Formby but he has been a liability to this point. Carroll should be at OG but the need at RT got him on the field IMO.

The 21 class has 2 starters at other schools. The 22 class is gone. 23 has been underwhelming and 24 is a bust to this point. 25 could be the key with Carroll and hopefully Lloyd. The truth is, we all know that the last few Saban years were a bust in terms of line play.

We have hit some homeruns but have a serious issue with singles and doubles.

2. Fit.

It's hard to even make judgements on what works and doesn't simply because the line is a mismatch of ill-fitting parts. We have guys with road grading size but missing the required athleticism and then we have a center who looks like an incoming freshman. There are no complimentary pieces and it was embarrassing all season. If you take out the Eastern Illinois and LA Monroe games, we averaged under 3 yards per carry on the season. Absolutely crazy.

3. Scheme
I am sorry but the lack of creativity was bad. What's worse is how incredibly predictable the running game was. When the answer to 4th and 1 is a handoff to Bernard, the question had no chance of being answered. How many other WRs did we run those sweeps for? It was painfully predictable.

Moving forward, there is talent still here but I see little immediate help from the incoming freshman. There needs to be some serious attention to fixing the line.
Nice post and well thought out.
 
OL is the only position I know from experience having played it. Alabama's problem is mostly coaching. Yes they have to be big, strong, and have good feet. But It's extremely technical, almost like having to know kung fu or something to be able to manipulate or move your guy. You don't necessarily have to blow him off the ball every play but if you looked last night they (Indiana) just walled off our DL, On running downs they looked like a choreographed swimming team. It was almost flawless. If we got anything going it was on a few pass rushes which are a little more unpredictable. You get that from guys who have played together every week and have been taught the right technique. it doesn't happen overnight, it can't be made to happen over night. Then sometimes you have to bow up and knock someone off the ball and once again Indiana could do that when they had to . That just requires a little meanness. Big guys are often often overgrown teddy bears. Who ever picked on them growing up? Nobody, Teddy Bears. Every so often you run across some dude who got skull dragged around his neighborhood by the psychopath teenager down the street who would end up in prison later. He just licks his wounds and takes it but later on hits a growth spurt and goes out for football and spends his career making everyone pay for the pain he suffered as a child.

Alabama rotated guys more than I've EVER seen at any level. Yes 2 guys can somewhat share a position early but by game 4 or so you got to pick the best 5 and go with it. Otherwise they are never going to be tight enough.

Alabama absolutely has no physicality, they ain't mean, they don't get excited. teddy bears.

I can't determine any specific technique being employed unless they are trying to zone block which at the college level must means brain injury for your backfield.

How to fix it? First fire the OL coach, I'm sure he's a nice guy, sorry, life sux.

Second find someone who has a great running game from a winning program and throw whatever money is necessary to the OL coach to hire him. I for one believe the entire team revolves around the OL. If that ain't right joe montana under center won't help. I would have no problem paying my OL coach second only to the head coach. it's that important.

Third in the portal find the meanest nastiest most awful OL you can find, someone who is so mean he will effect everyone around him. Someone who will literally eat teddy bears, these guys don't need another buddy they need a leader they fear. Once again if that requires money, find the money. but someone has to be the catalyst.

Do all that and by about game 5 next season we should start to see SOME improvement. But this is really going to take another full season or season and a half to fix IF WE STARTED TODAY.

Or we can do nothing and get skull dragged around by all the good teams like we did under Shula. Their choice.
 
OL is the only position I know from experience having played it. Alabama's problem is mostly coaching. Yes they have to be big, strong, and have good feet. But It's extremely technical, almost like having to know kung fu or something to be able to manipulate or move your guy. You don't necessarily have to blow him off the ball every play but if you looked last night they (Indiana) just walled off our DL, On running downs they looked like a choreographed swimming team. It was almost flawless. If we got anything going it was on a few pass rushes which are a little more unpredictable. You get that from guys who have played together every week and have been taught the right technique. it doesn't happen overnight, it can't be made to happen over night. Then sometimes you have to bow up and knock someone off the ball and once again Indiana could do that when they had to . That just requires a little meanness. Big guys are often often overgrown teddy bears. Who ever picked on them growing up? Nobody, Teddy Bears. Every so often you run across some dude who got skull dragged around his neighborhood by the psychopath teenager down the street who would end up in prison later. He just licks his wounds and takes it but later on hits a growth spurt and goes out for football and spends his career making everyone pay for the pain he suffered as a child.

Alabama rotated guys more than I've EVER seen at any level. Yes 2 guys can somewhat share a position early but by game 4 or so you got to pick the best 5 and go with it. Otherwise they are never going to be tight enough.

Alabama absolutely has no physicality, they ain't mean, they don't get excited. teddy bears.

I can't determine any specific technique being employed unless they are trying to zone block which at the college level must means brain injury for your backfield.

How to fix it? First fire the OL coach, I'm sure he's a nice guy, sorry, life sux.

Second find someone who has a great running game from a winning program and throw whatever money is necessary to the OL coach to hire him. I for one believe the entire team revolves around the OL. If that ain't right joe montana under center won't help. I would have no problem paying my OL coach second only to the head coach. it's that important.

Third in the portal find the meanest nastiest most awful OL you can find, someone who is so mean he will effect everyone around him. Someone who will literally eat teddy bears, these guys don't need another buddy they need a leader they fear. Once again if that requires money, find the money. but someone has to be the catalyst.

Do all that and by about game 5 next season we should start to see SOME improvement. But this is really going to take another full season or season and a half to fix IF WE STARTED TODAY.

Or we can do nothing and get skull dragged around by all the good teams like we did under Shula. Their choice.
This. I remember when we hired kap and he kept talking about how he liked to train every player at every position and rotate them like he discovered penicillin or something. I just think this guy was a big whiff. There are proven winners available out there I just don’t think KD is someone who likes to move on from whiffs. Be it strategy or starters or hires. We moved on from the safeties coach last year but I’d imagine that was Kane call. Maybe KD is just a really big picture guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stonecoldtide
OL is the only position I know from experience having played it. Alabama's problem is mostly coaching. Yes they have to be big, strong, and have good feet. But It's extremely technical, almost like having to know kung fu or something to be able to manipulate or move your guy. You don't necessarily have to blow him off the ball every play but if you looked last night they (Indiana) just walled off our DL, On running downs they looked like a choreographed swimming team. It was almost flawless. If we got anything going it was on a few pass rushes which are a little more unpredictable. You get that from guys who have played together every week and have been taught the right technique. it doesn't happen overnight, it can't be made to happen over night. Then sometimes you have to bow up and knock someone off the ball and once again Indiana could do that when they had to . That just requires a little meanness. Big guys are often often overgrown teddy bears. Who ever picked on them growing up? Nobody, Teddy Bears. Every so often you run across some dude who got skull dragged around his neighborhood by the psychopath teenager down the street who would end up in prison later. He just licks his wounds and takes it but later on hits a growth spurt and goes out for football and spends his career making everyone pay for the pain he suffered as a child.

Alabama rotated guys more than I've EVER seen at any level. Yes 2 guys can somewhat share a position early but by game 4 or so you got to pick the best 5 and go with it. Otherwise they are never going to be tight enough.

Alabama absolutely has no physicality, they ain't mean, they don't get excited. teddy bears.

I can't determine any specific technique being employed unless they are trying to zone block which at the college level must means brain injury for your backfield.

How to fix it? First fire the OL coach, I'm sure he's a nice guy, sorry, life sux.

Second find someone who has a great running game from a winning program and throw whatever money is necessary to the OL coach to hire him. I for one believe the entire team revolves around the OL. If that ain't right joe montana under center won't help. I would have no problem paying my OL coach second only to the head coach. it's that important.

Third in the portal find the meanest nastiest most awful OL you can find, someone who is so mean he will effect everyone around him. Someone who will literally eat teddy bears, these guys don't need another buddy they need a leader they fear. Once again if that requires money, find the money. but someone has to be the catalyst.

Do all that and by about game 5 next season we should start to see SOME improvement. But this is really going to take another full season or season and a half to fix IF WE STARTED TODAY.

Or we can do nothing and get skull dragged around by all the good teams like we did under Shula. Their choice.
If i could like a post 1000 times I would like this post 1000 times...nailed it and from someone with inside knowledge of the position. Great post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Islander
On a side note, It appears Alabama isn't the only team whose linemen sometimes have a "what were you thinking?" moment.
Orange Bowl. 3:15 in the 4th Qtr. Oregon up 16-0. Texas Tech has the ball on their own 36 yard line, 4th and 4. They are going for it (because they have to).

Texas Tech and Oregon's D line up like this:
4th Qtr Oregon vs Tex Tech1.jpeg
At the snap Oregon sends the four guys with their hands in the dirt, no blitz, no stunt. Right offensive tackle takes the left outside pass rusher. The right offensive guard takes the defensive tackle. The center ends up blocking no one. The left offensive guard takes the right defensive tackle, and, inexplicably, the left offensive tackle also blocks in on the defensive tackle along with the left offensive guard. Two o-linement double team one defensive tackle.
4th Qtr Oregon vs Tex Tech2.jpeg

Here is just the left side of the offense:
4th Qtr Oregon vs Tex Tech3.jpeg
Nobody picks up the right defensive outside pass rusher, who proceeds to annihilate the quarterback.
Go to the 12:12 point in this video for the play as it happened.
I can't say what the Texas Tech offensive line coach was expecting the left tackle to do here, but obviously double teaming the tackle and leaving the outside pass rusher unblocked on fourth and four when there's no help for the quarterback is an obvious, "What were you thinking?" moment.
Maybe the blocking schemes are too complicated, and o-line coaches are asking o-linemen to do too much thinking. I cannot imagine, however, a universe in which the offensive tackle would block in and leave the outside pass rusher unblocked on 4th and 4 with no help (the running back was going out to the right flat). I would seriously like to show that video to the left offensive tackle and ask him, "Who did you think was going to block that man?"
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads