Early commitments: Celebration or concern?
Facts as I see them:
1. We have a very limited number of scholarships available for 2007.
2. We have the earliest commitments I can recall!
3. The number one pick in Alabama committed to Florida.
4. Our commitments are not prominent on lists of 100 best players posted by the recruiting services.
5. Much of our attention is focused out-of-state.
6. Historically Alabama has based its success on getting the best players from in-state and complementing them with a select few from other states, mostly adjoining ones. That formula has worked for the last 100 years.
So, what can we infer from this? Good? Bad? Indifferent? Too early to tell? Other?
Facts as I see them:
1. We have a very limited number of scholarships available for 2007.
2. We have the earliest commitments I can recall!
3. The number one pick in Alabama committed to Florida.
4. Our commitments are not prominent on lists of 100 best players posted by the recruiting services.
5. Much of our attention is focused out-of-state.
6. Historically Alabama has based its success on getting the best players from in-state and complementing them with a select few from other states, mostly adjoining ones. That formula has worked for the last 100 years.
So, what can we infer from this? Good? Bad? Indifferent? Too early to tell? Other?