He's become one of the most powerful and important people in American politics, but not everyone agrees with his methods or opinions. He deserves his own political thread.
This is all we need at this point...a detailed top down look at government. This needed to be exposed. The actions need careful thought with regards to outcomes, not some shoot at the hip decision because that's how you run your business.If he were taking a list of problems, making clear proposals, debating these proposals, explaining why his numbers are correct/actually correcting his numbers, THEN taking appropriate action, I would think he's doing a good job. But, instead, he's a one man decision team acting like he's a slash and burn CEO for the country. No one person can understand our bureaucracy and certainly not understand it at the same time he's hacking it to pieces with an uninformed team of hackers.
I agree we need a top down look at our government. But not like this, not this fast, not this without public debate, not without public buy in, and certainly not from a guy that stands to gain so much power and money from his actions.
But sadly, too many people have lost faith (had their faith taken away by the constant anti-government drumbeat in media) in our government, while at the same time, too many uber-wealthy corporations and people have control of the groups in the government that are supposed to be monitoring their businesses. So, to fix this, we elected the uber wealthy folks in control of our government to clear out the workers that were the last line of defense against said businesses. There simply will be no way to slow or stop major pollution, corruption, oligopolies, monopsonies, for a long time if this keeps up, which is what the Trump team wants from what I can tell. I hope I'm wrong.
If this were Corporate America here then everything you listed would be appropriate and probably how it would go. However, we are talking about a behemoth larger than almost any other organization in the world with literally hundreds of years of inertia. If they had tried to run the downsizing operation like a corporate project it would be an epic failure, mostly because IT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN. It's almost like a war, US Gov't versus Taxpayers. The last thing you want to do in war is announce to your enemy all the moves you are going to make before you make them. The inertia on the US Gov't side would have been able to squelch this, just like every other attempt made to "root out fraud and waste". If I had a nickel for each time I've heard that phrase I might be able to afford a dozen eggs.If he were taking a list of problems, making clear proposals, debating these proposals, explaining why his numbers are correct/actually correcting his numbers, THEN taking appropriate action, I would think he's doing a good job. But, instead, he's a one man decision team acting like he's a slash and burn CEO for the country. No one person can understand our bureaucracy and certainly not understand it at the same time he's hacking it to pieces with an uninformed team of hackers.
I would argue that this method simply wouldn't work - talk it to death, delay, etc are the methods the bureaucracy has used for uncontrolled growth for decades.This is all we need at this point...a detailed top down look at government. This needed to be exposed. The actions need careful thought with regards to outcomes, not some shoot at the hip decision because that's how you run your business.
You're not wrong.I would argue that this method simply wouldn't work - talk it to death, delay, etc are the methods the bureaucracy has used for uncontrolled growth for decades.
You work with several people with NPD? I don't know that I buy that. You may work with some selfish jerks. How are you diagnosing these people? Maybe you have the background to do so. I don't know. What most people deal with are selfish people that get labeled with something like NPD. That's really not what they have. I've dealt with one person I think fits the profile, but I don't know for sure. I'm not capable of diagnosing that just like I'm not capable of diagnosing breast cancer.I think the easiest way to understand Elon Musk is to note that he almost certainly has narcissistic personality disorder. He is amoral and no empathy for others. I work with several people who have NPD and it is interesting to watch the same traits displayed over and over. He basically views himself as the center of the universe and others can be hurt and displaced without any concern as long as he gets what he wants. Mind you... It is amorality, he isn't evil per se, he just doesn't care.
He also displays the tendency of some extremely intelligent people to think that he can read a quick briefing and be more capable than someone with years of experience and intuition in a position, even when he doesn't really know what he is doing. He seems to be treating the Fed the same as Twitter when it comes to hacking and slashing and they are not the same. Firing the entire corps of tech workers who keep our nukes working is not smart. Period. He doesn't seem to ever consider the downstream consequences of his actions, expecting others to clean up the mess. He will take everything he does as a win, and everything that ends badly is because the little people didn't clean up properly after him.
Ultimately, NPD and the psychopathic traits they display can be very useful in military leaders, CEOs, and other positions of power* to a degree. But I believe we have gone overboard currently. A good read on this is the book "The Wisdom of Pyschopaths" by Kevin Dutton. I strongly recommend it for the current situation and to help you deal with these people in your own lives.
* Top college football coaches have these traits too... psychopathy itself isn't to imply one is an axe murderer, which is sociopathy, but rather the traits that let one do things without worry or concern. See also: Trump, Donald.
I think Elon fits the profile quite well. You are correct that I am speculating from afar. Mind you, I’m not meaning this a definitive. But his profile, abandoning his children, his lack of empathy, are all suggestive of meeting at least some of the diagnostic criteria. It’s also very difficult to diagnose these disorders even if you are seeing a person directly as their psychiatrist. And just like straight forward medical diagnoses these patients can have quiescent periods.You work with several people with NPD? I don't know that I buy that. You may work with some selfish jerks. How are you diagnosing these people? Maybe you have the background to do so. I don't know. What most people deal with are selfish people that get labeled with something like NPD. That's really not what they have. I've dealt with one person I think fits the profile, but I don't know for sure. I'm not capable of diagnosing that just like I'm not capable of diagnosing breast cancer.
It's super convenient to just label anyone you don't like as having NPD or as a psychopath. Musk apparently fits this profile for you. You do you, but those are some pretty presumptuous claims without any real contact with the guy to diagnose him even is you have the real training to do so.