Ghislaine Maxwell Receives 20 Years for Aiding Epstein in Sex Trafficking

[75thru79]

They've jerked us around so much that at this point they could release everything, fully unredacted and no one with a working brain would believe it was everything.

But on the other hand we're supposed to trust these same people with our well-being, health decisions, the economy, etc...

SMH

They could basically release everything and if the right person(s) or parties are not reflected the way some of these pols have been claiming then they will inevitably screech that there is some still missing info hidden inside Zapruders 8mm video.

The bottom line is if you are thinking there are going to be additional legal repercussions then you are going to be left holding the bag indefinitely. If there were grounds, meaning enough evidence to support a crime, in the remaining files charges would have already been brought. Surely, there will be people "cancelled" for their involvement but there won't be any more criminal charges.

 

[Bamaro]

They could basically release everything and if the right person(s) or parties are not reflected the way some of these pols have been claiming then they will inevitably screech that there is some still missing info hidden inside Zapruders 8mm video.

The bottom line is if you are thinking there are going to be additional legal repercussions then you are going to be left holding the bag indefinitely. If there were grounds, meaning enough evidence to support a crime, in the remaining files charges would have already been brought. Surely, there will be people "cancelled" for their involvement but there won't be any more criminal charges.

Depends on the evidenced and if we ever see it.

 

[75thru79]

Depends on the evidenced and if we ever see it.

That's the thing with conspiracy theories, they can almost NEVER be disproven. You're already setting the table for it. If the information proves not to lead to criminal charges then you'll just claim "they" kept it hidden because there are too many powerful people in the cross hairs and "they" had to hide it. I am of the opinion that this thing has a life of it's own and there is no way "they" are going to be able to keep it from coming out.

 

[Bamaro]

Ghislaine Maxwell pleads the Fifth, doesn't answer House panel's questions Washington — Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime associate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions during a virtual appearance before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Monday, chairman James Comer said. "As expected, Ghislaine Maxwell took the Fifth and refused to answer any questions. This obviously is very disappointing," Comer told reporters after the deposition. "We had many questions to ask about the crimes she and Epstein committed, as well as questions bout potential co-conspirators. We sincerely want to get to the truth for the American people and justice for survivors."​

The fix is obviously in. Stay quiet, bide your time at Club Fed and you will be eventually rewarded.

 

[selmaborntidefan]

That's the thing with conspiracy theories, they can almost NEVER be disproven.

This would be a problem if that's how anything worked in the real world. It's why we go with the legal fiction "innocent until PROVEN guilty."

I think conspiracy THEORIES are nothing more than circular arguments dressed up in verbiage. Actual conspiracies DO exist, of course, but we tend to learn of them because of this little thing called evidence.

Remember this: there is a cottage industry dedicated to the idea that God knows how many assassins firing God knows how many guns shot Kennedy dead in Dallas on November 22, 1963, and the only guy a lot of people think DID NOT shoot Kennedy was Lee Harvey Oswald. The perfect crime if a conspiracy.

Bear in mind these people reside in the same world where I managed to know every intricate detail of what one President did with a cigar with his intern, but they believe a bunch of apparent phantoms fired a bunch of invisible guns with invisible bullets - because literally every scrap of evidence in existence tells a simple story of one guy firing three shots from the sixth floor of a book warehouse and killing the President, fleeing the scene, killing a cop in front of about ten witnesses and getting arrested in a theatre where he (wait for it) pulled a gun on the cops arresting him.

It's not going to make any movies, but the JFK killing is among the simpler crimes in the history of humanity. Notice that everyone who bangs the conspiracy drum on that subject is someone who BEGINS HIS ARGUMENT with demanding an explanation of a pedantic point while always ignoring the Mount Everest of evidence in front of him.

But he has an answer for that, too: if the evidence proves Oswald did it, it's part of the frame up. If the evidence might be interpreted another way, we get the insistence it's the smoking gun. And then when the next evidence contradicts that, you just say the evidence was altered, changed, or destroyed.