Yes, that's what I was trying to convey with the pre engineered building analogy.fifyOur engineering curriculums only merged in 100 level classes.
I think I understand what happens in this bridge is that the weight makes the arch want to flatten and the ends of the arch move away from the center. The beam that cracked keeps the ends of the arch from moving away from each other. I would guess that without this beam in place there is thrust on the foundation (maybe why it's being inspected?).
Yes, that's probably a better analogy to use. Most folks don't visualize a PEMB. I only used it as the example since it's a three hinged arch and the bridge is what's called a tied arch.Thanks. That makes sense. It's like a wind beam between rafters in a stick-built house...
If that were a tooth it would be called a fracture. The fracture happens after the crack.I like how they keep calling it a crack. A crack is something that hasn't broken yet. That thing is not a crack.![]()
A fracture or rupture is generally what you hear on a tension failure like this.If that were a tooth it would be called a fracture. The fracture happens after the crack.
Fulmer drove over it. The engineers did not account for the extra weight.Let the conspiracy theories begin...
Local news is saying they're currently in the mode of determining whether the bridge can even sustain it's own weight right now.It's probably a miracle it didn't collapse.
I can't imagine how long it would take to build that analysis model. I bet it already exists though, since there was the seismic upgrade project. Still, the computer model won't necessarily be able to take into account the things that are helping that aren't necessarily supposed to be helping.Local news is saying they're currently in the mode of determining whether the bridge can even sustain it's own weight right now.
I drove over that bridge and back this past Sunday...![]()
Is that piece important?This is bad - over 50k vehicles a day use this bridge, over a quarter of which are tractor-trailers (Memphis is a major distribution hub). The "crack" as it was described, was discovered during routine inspections yesterday and the bridge was closed immediately. For now, all traffic is being re-routed over the Mississippi via the smaller (and older) I55 bridge.
Latest news says they've no idea how long this major bridge will be closed but it "could be several months" before repairs are completed...
The 'crack' (aka a stress fracture):
View attachment 16363
I fear this is the first of many failures we'll see in the near future as our infrastructure has largely been ignored as it's not something 'sexy' to spend money on...
Get some Gorilla Glue and duck tape. It will be good as new.Is that piece important?
I was just about to post the same thing.I like how they keep calling it a crack. A crack is something that hasn't broken yet. That thing is not a crack.![]()
In this case, it's not just vehicular traffic on the bridge. The way I read this quote from the article in your post #61 above is that it's unsafe to pass under the bridge, so traffic on the Mississippi River is stopped as well.This is bad - over 50k vehicles a day use this bridge, over a quarter of which are tractor-trailers (Memphis is a major distribution hub). The "crack" as it was described, was discovered during routine inspections yesterday and the bridge was closed immediately. For now, all traffic is being re-routed over the Mississippi via the smaller (and older) I55 bridge.
Latest news says they've no idea how long this major bridge will be closed but it "could be several months" before repairs are completed...
The 'crack' (aka a stress fracture):
View attachment 16363
I fear this is the first of many failures we'll see in the near future as our infrastructure has largely been ignored as it's not something 'sexy' to spend money on...
This is bad news. The amount of product that moves up and down the Mississippi is staggering.In this case, it's not just vehicular traffic on the bridge. The way I read this quote from the article in your post #61 above is that it's unsafe to pass under the bridge, so traffic on the Mississippi River is stopped as well.
"Traffic is non-existent on the famed “M” bridge. The U.S. Coast Guard reported 16 vessels and 229 barges at a standstill, all due to this crack in the bridge’s support beam discovered by inspectors Tuesday."
I certainly don't know, but the Mississippi River is such a major commercial artery that I wouldn't be surprised if that's a bigger economic issue than diverting vehicular traffic.
If there's a legitimate question as to whether the bridge can support its own weight, I don't know how you put personnel on it to fix the problem. It might have to be demolished.
When I was taking steel design for architecture, we decided to see if it is at all possible to design a beam that could not support its own weight. How big would it need to be?
Pretty much any beam size made can be proportioned to collapse under it's own weight. If it's long enough without any bracing of the compression flange, down it will go.When I was taking steel design for architecture, we decided to see if it is at all possible to design a beam that could not support its own weight. How big would it need to be?
Yes it is possible. See dayhiker's post above. I don't remember the size but it was pretty darn big.