Half these games I don't watch. For me, overkill to the nth degree. Flamingo State vs Metropolitan University just doesn't interest me.
With the non-playoff bowl games being more meaningless than ever I think they need to take the Pop Tarts approach and make the games more about being entertaining spectacles than anything else.
Some of the games match up teams that many if not most people don't even know exist and if they do they don't even care.
NIL + transfer portal = less player development
The game is far less watchable now than 10 years ago. Parity = widespread mediocrity (in CFB).
Regulated parity in CFB, as in most endeavors, is achieved by boosting the have-nots at the expense of the haves, not by leaving the haves alone and boosting the have-nots. As a "have," obviously we Alabama fans think the game is less watchable now. The question for the sport overall is, does parity bring in enough incremental interest from others (the casual fans) to more than compensate for the waning interest of traditional fans? If so, then regulated parity might make sense for the sport overall, however much you and I are unhappy about it....The game is far less watchable now than 10 years ago. Parity = widespread mediocrity (in CFB).
I think you're right, for three reasons.
First there are a gazillion bowls and simply not enough interesting teams to fill them all up.
Second, a lot of players who feel they have NFL potential are choosing not to play.
Third, a surprising number of bowl-eligible teams are choosing not to participate. Which I don't understand at all.
If you weren't jobbed by the CFP, but just weren't a Top 12 team, why would you pass up the chance to improve and prep for 2026?
If you have a star player sitting out, why not use the time to improve the rest of the team? 2026 is coming whether you sit home or play.
Even if you really were jobbed by absolutely ridiculous CFP rules, why would you pass up the chance for essentially a second spring's worth of practices simply because you're justifiably butt-hurt?
I just don't get it.
The only logic I can figure is that you feel that the opportunity to evaluate and recruit players in the portal outweighs the benefit from bowl practices. I don't think that's so, but it is an internally consistent thought process.
I associate acronyms with inferior college football.
Third, a surprising number of bowl-eligible teams are choosing not to participate. Which I don't understand at all.
Surely lesser teams can travel and play for less and break even. After all, there is a practice and development benefit to bowl games, or at least they say there is a benefit to all of that practice time. Frankly either way, I'm not concerned with any team not named Alabama. Let them make or lose money, I don't care.![]()
Cost of Going to Bowl Games Is Greater than Payouts - Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics
Bloomberg News reported on the cost to schools in the highest competitive division in the NCAA for their football teams playing in bowl games. According to the article, at least 13 schools spent more to play in a football bowl game than their athletic conferences received in compensation...www.knightcommission.org
didn't watch but heard a blocked PAT in OT was the differenceIf you didn't watch the 14 yard TD strike to TACO!!! In the FCS title game last night you missed the best danged game of the year. Go Bobcats!!!
That used to be the case, when guys were tied to a program, because they wanted to be there. Now, they want BAG FIRST. Whoever and wherever it comes from.Heck... Bowl practices are an entire spring practice! Given the lack of practice time it seems like it would be worth it to run drills and prep younger guys even if you had half the staff working the portal. Snaps are snaps and they come at a premium.