the eye of mauronThe way the Court is leaning, I'm suspecting it will be overturned.
Under his eye.
the eye of mauronThe way the Court is leaning, I'm suspecting it will be overturned.
Under his eye.
It's still a bad thing? But at least in this case it is a private business.![]()
SF bookstore no longer selling 'Harry Potter' due to author J.K. Rowling's anti-transgender politics
A San Francisco bookstore will no longer carry the "Harry Potter" series due to author J.K. Rowling's political actions toward excluding transgender women from gendered spaces.abc7news.com
I’m old enough to remember when book bans were a bad thing…..oh yeah, because it was literally 5 minutes ago.
That's ok! Unless some witchcraft-believing religious whacko raises a stink, the Potter books should be available in every school library, so kids can access them for free!![]()
SF bookstore no longer selling 'Harry Potter' due to author J.K. Rowling's anti-transgender politics
A San Francisco bookstore will no longer carry the "Harry Potter" series due to author J.K. Rowling's political actions toward excluding transgender women from gendered spaces.abc7news.com
I’m old enough to remember when book bans were a bad thing…..oh yeah, because it was literally 5 minutes ago.
I do too but I at least understand the where the store owner is coming from. They don't want to help finance her cause and she is using funds from her book sales to fund it apparently. And they are a private business and have the right to make that choice IMO. I don't expect Christian book stores to start selling a book series that financially benefits planned parenthood or something./
That's ok! Unless some witchcraft-believing religious whacko raises a stink, the Potter books should be available in every school library, so kids can access them for free!
BTW, I disagree with the bookstore removing them from its shelves.
Well, we all know the issue with Harry Potter is not the witchcraft, it's the ant-trans stance of the author. The original poster was highlighting the hypocrisy of the left.That's ok! Unless some witchcraft-believing religious whacko raises a stink, the Potter books should be available in every school library, so kids can access them for free!
OK, and as you chose to omit from my response, I disagree with the bookstore's actions as well.Well, we all know the issue with Harry Potter is not the witchcraft, it's the ant-trans stance of the author. The original poster was highlighting the hypocrisy of the left.
Someone should tell them to just bake the damn cake.......oh, wait.BTW, I disagree with the bookstore removing them from its shelves.
I mind if a business chooses not to serve a protected class, but others might feel differently.Someone should tell them to just bake the damn cake.......oh, wait.
Truth be told, I honestly don't mind a private business making a business decision like this. I don't mind if a bakery doesn't want to make a gay cake. This is what is great about free markets. I'm happy to give my money to the businesses who want it. And those that don't? Welp, hope it all works out for ya.
Remember the cafe that charged an extra 18% tax on men? It was meant to bring awareness to the (mythical) pay gap, but all it really did was wind up closing down the business. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. This is especially true in a Capitalist society.
I feel differently only because the notion of a "protected class" is utterly outrageous to me. The point of equality is to level the playing field for all. Just my opinion....I mind if a business chooses not to serve a protected class, but others might feel differently.
It would be wonderful if the playing field was level for everyone and I wish we lived in a country where protected class status was unnecessary, but I don't think that's the case yet. For now, let's agree to disagree.I feel differently only because the notion of a "protected class" is utterly outrageous to me. The point of equality is to level the playing field for all. Just my opinion....
There's a slight difference between the state removing a book from the shelves and a private business deciding not to carry a particular product--book or otherwise.![]()
SF bookstore no longer selling 'Harry Potter' due to author J.K. Rowling's anti-transgender politics
A San Francisco bookstore will no longer carry the "Harry Potter" series due to author J.K. Rowling's political actions toward excluding transgender women from gendered spaces.abc7news.com
I’m old enough to remember when book bans were a bad thing…..oh yeah, because it was literally 5 minutes ago.
Correct, but the question remains: if a bookstore banned all LGB materials from its inventory, would there be much wailing and gnashing of teeth? Yes. Yes, there would. Would hysterical leftists label it a book ban, even though that is technically incorrect? Yes. Yes, they would. I'm reasonably certain the nazis would be invoked and accusations of fascism would be flying from every direction.There's a slight difference between the state removing a book from the shelves and a private business deciding not to carry a particular product--book or otherwise.
To be fair, I'm sure there are many Christian bookstores that don't carry LGBTQ materials. And there are likely independent bookstores owned by conservatives that don't have those books on their shelves. The big difference is that they don't find it necessary to issue press releases about their decision.Correct, but the question remains: if a bookstore banned all LGB materials from its inventory, would there be much wailing and gnashing of teeth? Yes. Yes, there would. Would hysterical leftists label it a book ban, even though that is technically incorrect? Yes. Yes, they would. I'm reasonably certain the nazis would be invoked and accusations of fascism would be flying from every direction.
I know Americans will never agree on anything, but is it too much to ask for a single standard for stuff like this? Apparently so. And don't you hate it when people answer their own questions like this? Yes, yes I do.
Probably, particularly when taken in the context of the administration seeking to strip people of constitutional rights, and the Supreme Court's gleeful willingness to enable it.I'm reasonably certain the nazis would be invoked and accusations of fascism would be flying from every direction.