LGBTQ Issues (Part 3)

RollTide_HTTR

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2017
10,030
8,888
187

I’m old enough to remember when book bans were a bad thing…..oh yeah, because it was literally 5 minutes ago.
It's still a bad thing? But at least in this case it is a private business.
 

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
6,799
13,973
287
Jacksonville, FL
/

I’m old enough to remember when book bans were a bad thing…..oh yeah, because it was literally 5 minutes ago.
That's ok! Unless some witchcraft-believing religious whacko raises a stink, the Potter books should be available in every school library, so kids can access them for free!

BTW, I disagree with the bookstore removing them from its shelves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide

RollTide_HTTR

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2017
10,030
8,888
187
/

That's ok! Unless some witchcraft-believing religious whacko raises a stink, the Potter books should be available in every school library, so kids can access them for free!

BTW, I disagree with the bookstore removing them from its shelves.
I do too but I at least understand the where the store owner is coming from. They don't want to help finance her cause and she is using funds from her book sales to fund it apparently. And they are a private business and have the right to make that choice IMO. I don't expect Christian book stores to start selling a book series that financially benefits planned parenthood or something.

I would feel differently if they were trying to get the books removed from public libraries or schools.
 

75thru79

3rd Team
Nov 22, 2024
229
288
72
That's ok! Unless some witchcraft-believing religious whacko raises a stink, the Potter books should be available in every school library, so kids can access them for free!
Well, we all know the issue with Harry Potter is not the witchcraft, it's the ant-trans stance of the author. The original poster was highlighting the hypocrisy of the left.
 

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
6,799
13,973
287
Jacksonville, FL
Well, we all know the issue with Harry Potter is not the witchcraft, it's the ant-trans stance of the author. The original poster was highlighting the hypocrisy of the left.
OK, and as you chose to omit from my response, I disagree with the bookstore's actions as well.

And the issue for many has been the "witchcraft." I remember this case from a few years ago:


And a little more:

 
Last edited:
  • Thank You
Reactions: 92tide

CrimsonJazz

Hall of Fame
May 27, 2022
7,614
8,912
187
BTW, I disagree with the bookstore removing them from its shelves.
Someone should tell them to just bake the damn cake.......oh, wait.

Truth be told, I honestly don't mind a private business making a business decision like this. I don't mind if a bakery doesn't want to make a gay cake. This is what is great about free markets. I'm happy to give my money to the businesses who want it. And those that don't? Welp, hope it all works out for ya.

Remember the cafe that charged an extra 18% tax on men? It was meant to bring awareness to the (mythical) pay gap, but all it really did was wind up closing down the business. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. This is especially true in a Capitalist society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crimsonaudio

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
6,799
13,973
287
Jacksonville, FL
Someone should tell them to just bake the damn cake.......oh, wait.

Truth be told, I honestly don't mind a private business making a business decision like this. I don't mind if a bakery doesn't want to make a gay cake. This is what is great about free markets. I'm happy to give my money to the businesses who want it. And those that don't? Welp, hope it all works out for ya.

Remember the cafe that charged an extra 18% tax on men? It was meant to bring awareness to the (mythical) pay gap, but all it really did was wind up closing down the business. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. This is especially true in a Capitalist society.
I mind if a business chooses not to serve a protected class, but others might feel differently.

As far as Rowling goes, if a bookstore chooses not to stock her work, that's its choice. Without discussing my stance on Rowling's comments, I still express my disagreement with the decision. However, as you say, people have the right to take their money elsewhere.
 

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
6,799
13,973
287
Jacksonville, FL
I feel differently only because the notion of a "protected class" is utterly outrageous to me. The point of equality is to level the playing field for all. Just my opinion....
It would be wonderful if the playing field was level for everyone and I wish we lived in a country where protected class status was unnecessary, but I don't think that's the case yet. For now, let's agree to disagree.
 

jthomas666

Hall of Fame
Aug 14, 2002
24,616
14,119
287
62
Birmingham & Warner Robins

I’m old enough to remember when book bans were a bad thing…..oh yeah, because it was literally 5 minutes ago.
There's a slight difference between the state removing a book from the shelves and a private business deciding not to carry a particular product--book or otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide

CrimsonJazz

Hall of Fame
May 27, 2022
7,614
8,912
187
There's a slight difference between the state removing a book from the shelves and a private business deciding not to carry a particular product--book or otherwise.
Correct, but the question remains: if a bookstore banned all LGB materials from its inventory, would there be much wailing and gnashing of teeth? Yes. Yes, there would. Would hysterical leftists label it a book ban, even though that is technically incorrect? Yes. Yes, they would. I'm reasonably certain the nazis would be invoked and accusations of fascism would be flying from every direction.

I know Americans will never agree on anything, but is it too much to ask for a single standard for stuff like this? Apparently so. And don't you hate it when people answer their own questions like this? Yes, yes I do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AWRTR

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
6,799
13,973
287
Jacksonville, FL
Correct, but the question remains: if a bookstore banned all LGB materials from its inventory, would there be much wailing and gnashing of teeth? Yes. Yes, there would. Would hysterical leftists label it a book ban, even though that is technically incorrect? Yes. Yes, they would. I'm reasonably certain the nazis would be invoked and accusations of fascism would be flying from every direction.

I know Americans will never agree on anything, but is it too much to ask for a single standard for stuff like this? Apparently so. And don't you hate it when people answer their own questions like this? Yes, yes I do.
To be fair, I'm sure there are many Christian bookstores that don't carry LGBTQ materials. And there are likely independent bookstores owned by conservatives that don't have those books on their shelves. The big difference is that they don't find it necessary to issue press releases about their decision.
 

jthomas666

Hall of Fame
Aug 14, 2002
24,616
14,119
287
62
Birmingham & Warner Robins

1. If he signed a contract with the morals clause, then the school was within its rights to fire him. It sucks, but them's the breaks. Actually, they might still be within their rights had there not been a morals clause. It's not like the Church's attitude towards LGTBQ is a guarded secret.

2. IF the administration had known about his marriage for some time, then it's a particularly douchey move, but again, contract. If the morals clause wasn't there and he could prove that the school knew about his marriage when he was hired, he might have a legal leg to stand on, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Full disclosure: My mom was fired as the principle of a Catholic school because she got divorced. She was fired by the same priest who had counseled her in the months leading up to the divorce. Which is one reason I'm particularly leery of organized religion.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: BamaHoHo and 92tide

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
6,799
13,973
287
Jacksonville, FL
NYT gift link

Budapest Pride Parade Was Bigger Than Ever, Despite Orban’s Ban
Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s party enacted the ban, but Budapest’s mayor allowed the event to go on. The police sat on the sidelines.

A government ban on Hungary’s annual Pride parade backfired on Saturday when more than 100,000 people marched through the Hungarian capital, far more than have taken part in previous such events.

Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Friday warned people to stay away from the banned parade, threatening “clear legal consequences” for anyone taking part. Government warnings, however, only turned what is usually a low-key event attended by a few thousand L.G.B.T.Q. activists and their friends into a mass rally against Mr. Orban’s government.
 

New Posts

Latest threads