Some of you are familiar with my investment philosophies. They're not terribly popular with the general public because:
1. They require discipline over decades, which means....
1A. You have to keep your head, turn off the TV and talk radio during recessions, put your fingers in your ears, hum, and keep on keeping on.
2. They require taking responsibility for your own financial well-being, and not spending every dime you make. This flies in the face of today's spending and "it's not my fault," cultures.
3. They don't yield a ton of additional dollars for at least 5 years because.....
4. They rely on geeky stuff like exponents to generate the real money later in the process
5. Most of all, they require doing stuff that most people laugh at, and not doing stuff that most people pressure you to do.
I have a friend who sums it up well: Borrow as little as possible, for as short a period of time as possible, buy used cars, and Keep Calm and Invest On.
Here's an article that, if you follow it for 20 years, you'll be giving thanks for a lot of really cool things, most especially financial freedom.
Strategies for Lasting Security
One thing I would clarify: The article rightly includes maxing out your 401k and IRA. It doesn't, however, define that.
Too many people erroneously define, "maxed out," as contributing so that you get the maximum employer match. That's a good start, but only a start.
Truly maxing out is contributing $19K a year if you're under 50, and $25K a year if you're 50 or older. Those numbers adjust upward every so often, so once you finally get there, it also means keeping up with the increases.
I know that seems impossible. But I promise, it isn't. Here's how Mrs. Basket Case and I did it: First, we started by contributing the most we could, and we were painfully honest with ourselves as to what "the most we could" was. That means having hard conversations distinguishing have-to-buy vs. want-to-buy. That was really the hardest part.
Then, every time we got a raise or a bonus, the raises went straight into the 401k, and bonuses went straight into the IRAs.
The bad part is that it meant we effectively didn't get a raise for 7-8 years.
The good part is that it enforced discipline around lifestyle spending. While we went through the 7-8 dry years, watching the nest egg grow helped to sustain the effort.
A better part is that, when we finally did truly max out, we got to spend on some fun stuff (in our case, travel) without guilt about where the money should be going.
The best part is that, when we reached that point, financial freedom was no longer an abstract concept that only “other people†could have. It was realistically achievable for us.
1. They require discipline over decades, which means....
1A. You have to keep your head, turn off the TV and talk radio during recessions, put your fingers in your ears, hum, and keep on keeping on.
2. They require taking responsibility for your own financial well-being, and not spending every dime you make. This flies in the face of today's spending and "it's not my fault," cultures.
3. They don't yield a ton of additional dollars for at least 5 years because.....
4. They rely on geeky stuff like exponents to generate the real money later in the process
5. Most of all, they require doing stuff that most people laugh at, and not doing stuff that most people pressure you to do.
I have a friend who sums it up well: Borrow as little as possible, for as short a period of time as possible, buy used cars, and Keep Calm and Invest On.
Here's an article that, if you follow it for 20 years, you'll be giving thanks for a lot of really cool things, most especially financial freedom.
Strategies for Lasting Security
One thing I would clarify: The article rightly includes maxing out your 401k and IRA. It doesn't, however, define that.
Too many people erroneously define, "maxed out," as contributing so that you get the maximum employer match. That's a good start, but only a start.
Truly maxing out is contributing $19K a year if you're under 50, and $25K a year if you're 50 or older. Those numbers adjust upward every so often, so once you finally get there, it also means keeping up with the increases.
I know that seems impossible. But I promise, it isn't. Here's how Mrs. Basket Case and I did it: First, we started by contributing the most we could, and we were painfully honest with ourselves as to what "the most we could" was. That means having hard conversations distinguishing have-to-buy vs. want-to-buy. That was really the hardest part.
Then, every time we got a raise or a bonus, the raises went straight into the 401k, and bonuses went straight into the IRAs.
The bad part is that it meant we effectively didn't get a raise for 7-8 years.
The good part is that it enforced discipline around lifestyle spending. While we went through the 7-8 dry years, watching the nest egg grow helped to sustain the effort.
A better part is that, when we finally did truly max out, we got to spend on some fun stuff (in our case, travel) without guilt about where the money should be going.
The best part is that, when we reached that point, financial freedom was no longer an abstract concept that only “other people†could have. It was realistically achievable for us.
Last edited: