| C/ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | INT | QBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18/28 | 302 | 10.8 | 2 | 0 | 71.2 |
They lean heavily into the run game on offense. Given our issues in setting edges, gap integrity and DB support in the run game, it won’t be easy to slow them down. They are going to score points.
Their defense is rather suspect. My guess this game will one where we will need to out score them. Something like 42-35.
Keenan and Tim Smith -- both are equally valuable.I have watched zero of their games. Their defense can be had, this is what Sellers did to them in their house:
They run a lot, 109 rushes(9 TD) vs 39 targets(1 TD) for their top guys. They may gash us better than Vandy/UGA. I'm glad to have Keenan back and I think we hold up well.
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT QBR 18/28 302 10.8 2 0 71.2
People keep saying Tim Smith. Tim now plays for the Colts. You mean James Smith!Keenan and Tim Smith -- both are equally valuable.
OOPS...senior brain...People keep saying Tim Smith. Tim now plays for the Colts. You mean James Smith!
Saw some talking heads saying that playing Vandy before Missouri was a good thing because Missouri runs an offense very similar to Vandy’s. Haven’t a clue how accurate that might be, but if it is, good.Alabama has played a top 5 schedule and they've played the 150th schedule. It's really hard to compare stats.
They will try to rush the ball. The question then becomes it is the second half Alabama defense from the past couple games or the first half defense? I read that Alabama only allowed 20 yards on 7 carries in the second half against Vandy. That's a solid effort against a good running team.
The other question becomes will Alabama be able to keep the offense balanced?Against South Carolina, Missouri had the ball 11 minutes more (kind of expected when you rush 48 times).Ty struggled some when he was back there trying to do it all, so some balance in the offense should help both the offense and defense (by letting them rest).
Yesterday I watched a recording of the game. McElroy did a good job of explaining one difference on the shovel pass that is easy for the offense to execute, but hard for the defense to recognize and stop.Isn’t their run game more “traditional “ than Vandy’s? If so I would like our chances a little more. I think our D line is coming around and there could be less eye candy fo LBs and DBs to sift through.
I asked the question on another thread, but it strikes me that a perfectly executed shovel pass type of play is almost impossible to defend every time. It will have success. One must scheme the defense to expect that one type of play on every down, so obviously it opens the door for everything else an offense can throw at it.Yesterday I watched a recording of the game. McElroy did a good job of explaining one difference on the shovel pass that is easy for the offense to execute, but hard for the defense to recognize and stop.
Diego Pavia is a world-class punk. Vandy runs its offense well.
I asked the question on another thread, but it strikes me that a perfectly executed shovel pass type of play is almost impossible to defend every time. It will have success. One must scheme the defense to expect that one type of play on every down, so obviously it opens the door for everything else an offense can throw at it.
Gary Hollingsworth and Siran Stacey could do it pretty well too.Spurrier used to use that very well with Florida back in the 90s. It was infuriating.