Saw some talking heads saying that playing Vandy before Missouri was a good thing because Missouri runs an offense very similar to Vandy’s. Haven’t a clue how accurate that might be, but if it is, good.
The bad: It's @ Missouri, they are coming off a bye, and Missouri is a good rushing team (Alabama is 70th in rushing yards allowed).
The good: As you noted there are similarities, if nothing else in terms of both being teams that generally rushed well. Missouri is untested, Alabama certainly has been tested.
I did look at these two games as Alabama's chance to figure out the run. It should be a focal point since both teams run the ball and coming into the Missouri game it's their primary weapon. This is kind of like an old Alabama team on offense, they pass some, they run a lot. Alabama improved against the run in the second half against Vanderbilt and if they show progress in the area it could be a long day for Missouri because they run the ball almost 20 times more per game than they pass.
It is strongly weighted towards current seasons offensive and defensive numbers. It does not allow for SOS in any way. It also said that Vandy would beat Bama 34-32.
I have my doubts about the accuracy of both this and SP+ because they SoS certainly should be a major factor in my opinion.
According to Sagarin, Alabama is ranked third with an SoS of 4. Missouri is 19th with an SoS of 150. According to FPI Alabama is 4th with an SOR of 10th. Missouri is 18th with an SOR of 14th.
SP+ is more generous to Missouri, ranking Alabama 6th and Missouri 8th.
The composite computer rankings have Alabama third and Missouri 18th. Missouri can still win, with their biggest advantage probably being Alabama coming in kind of battle weary, but they haven't really proven anything on the field yet.