Once they become "employees" why should there be limits? Are other state employees limited to 4-5 years?
I don’t even think the need to be employees will will impact it. The courts have already slapped the NCAA’s hand on NIL. They then slapped them in the face on restrictions on transfer, saying you can’t prevent/block transfers if a “normal” student can do it anytime they want to.
The NCAA is going to have a difficult position to say arbitrarily that a player only gets “4-5 years” because, just like Pavia's attorneys positioned it, a player playing for a university has a significantly greater opportunities to earn NIL revenues than someone that doesn’t. And this judge, and I’m afraid many others will as well, will see limits to eligibility as a conspiracy by the NCAA and the Universities to restrict those NIL opportunities- which this judge said would be a violation of anti-trust laws.
Heck, it may turn out the NCAA may only be able to say you must be a student “in good standing” to play. Can you image some 30 year old guy working on his third degree at a school lining up against a 17 year old freshman?
You are absolutely correct though. The only way these programs can get any reasonable control is to make them employees.Then eligibility issues are moot. But then you have Title IX and equal opportunity issues across all sports to deal with.
The NCAA and college sports are in a world of hurt.