It's not, but voters will take into consideration that he has put up incredible numbers over time and stuck around for his senior year.Didn't realize the Doak Walker Award was a career award. Thought it was for a season. Who knew.
It's not, but voters will take into consideration that he has put up incredible numbers over time and stuck around for his senior year.Didn't realize the Doak Walker Award was a career award. Thought it was for a season. Who knew.
I'm not arguing that. The post said he should get it for career achievements. The award isn't for the career. It's for the year.He also had the best season this year (and last year). Check the stats.
And that is why some awards are losing their "shine."It's not, but voters will take into consideration that he has put up incredible numbers over time and stuck around for his senior year.
Sure it is - last year saw Trent Richardson win the award with far fewer yards and TDs than Montee Ball. I mean, their stats were not even remotely comparable. But Trent won.I know its not taken into consideration by the powers that be
B1gtide,dont you think ball would have some durability issues?? Hasnt he had some injury issues every season?? Maybe im mistaken as im no fan or follower of big ten football but i was under the impression that in each oh his seasons at wisconsin hes had some problems with injury.Sure it is - last year saw Trent Richardson win the award with far fewer yards and TDs than Montee Ball. I mean, their stats were not even remotely comparable. But Trent won.
We have no idea how Montee Ball would have done at Alabama, but I suspect that he would have done very well.
Who hasn't that plays that position? Consider the work load. Playing for Alabama, he would not have the stats but he would also not have taken the beating. But I really think he could play anywhere.B1gtide,dont you think ball would have some durability issues?? Hasnt he had some injury issues every season?? Maybe im mistaken as im no fan or follower of big ten football but i was under the impression that in each oh his seasons at wisconsin hes had some problems with injury.
Of course theres going to be the nagging injuries that all backs endure and play with. Im talking about injuries that cause players to miss games. Maybe he could play anywhere,however i still dont think he measures up to todd gurley or keith marshall. Of course im biasedWho hasn't that plays that position? Consider the work load. Playing for Alabama, he would not have the stats but he would also not have taken the beating. But I really think he could play anywhere.
I have really enjoyed watching Mark celebrate with Trent, Trent celebrate with Eddie, and Eddie celebrate with TJ when the #2 guy makes a big play.More and more of the better SEC teams are spreading the carries over two, or even three backs. Our third back hasn't gotten as many carries as the #3s before him, apparently because of some difficulty mastering the blocking schemes. Even with two, it really cuts into the carries. The SEC coaches, and particularly Saban, have been successful in getting through to the RB prospects that they will have a longer shelf life in the NFL if they're not having to carry the ball 95% of the running plays. Once the guys realize this, they become very team-oriented and supportive of each other. It's a breath of fresh air, compared to all the prima donna acts on other teams when the guy who thinks he's the "featured back" isn't getting the carries he feels he deserves...
Forgive me for not looking it up myself, but when you refer to "yards", are you meaning rushing yards or all purpose yards?Sure it is - last year saw Trent Richardson win the award with far fewer yards and TDs than Montee Ball. I mean, their stats were not even remotely comparable. But Trent won.
We have no idea how Montee Ball would have done at Alabama, but I suspect that he would have done very well.
Either - he had more of both.Forgive me for not looking it up myself, but when you refer to "yards", are you meaning rushing yards or all purpose yards?