I agree. We were definitely not trying to milk the clock. I get wanting to stay aggressive, but it seemed like we were trying to have it both ways -- less aggressive but not committed to ground and pound either. I see three issues here that could come back to bite us later in the season.A lot has been said on here about DeBoer "taking his foot off the gas", and he was "watching the clock". But I did not see that happen. And none of the coaches have mentioned anything like that happening, as even a small reason for the second half playing out like it did. My thoughts as I was watching the game were that Kirby made really good halftime adjustments, and Bama struggled with it. They couldn't seem to counter those adjustments quick enough. And CKD said he attributes the second half to the four 4th down conversions Georgia made. He said they stop 2 of those, and the second half looks a lot different. I certainly agree. But apparently, there was no taking the foot off the gas. That's just conjecture. Georgia was just good in the 2nd half.
1. OL interior run blocking is not as strong as I would have expected. Georgia had that shut down all game long. Once they figured out how to seal the edge our run game became completely bottled up. We need to improve here.
2. For some reason we tend to snap the ball with 10-15 seconds left. I'm not sure why, but that limited our ability to eat clock. I would guess that that amounted to at least a couple of minutes of clock that we gave back to Georgia. That may be deliberate -- perhaps we made a conscious decision to play fast and keep the D on its heels, but it mostly didn't work in the second half.
3. Related to 1 and 2, Georgia made a lot of good defensive adjustments at halftime, and we didn't seem to have a lot of adjustments of our own to counter those.
But hell, there is a reason I don't get paid to coach. I have no doubt that our staff knew exactly what they were doing. These aren't complaints, just observations.