Opinions about new NFL kickoff rules

BamaMoon

Hall of Fame
Apr 1, 2004
22,940
21,039
282
Boone, NC
Watching some preseason NFL yesterday and was wondering what your opinions (other than how weird it looks) might be?
 

Tide&True

All-American
Sep 24, 2004
4,903
2,587
282
Murfreesboro, TN
It all looks very unnatural to me…seeing the players frozen on the line of scrimmage as the ball sails over their heads. I prefer the already neutered kickoff system that preceded this change.
 

JDCrimson

Hall of Fame
Feb 12, 2006
6,493
6,495
187
52
Do you mean players were still getting hurt on all those fair catches inside the 25 yard line?

I still contend the put return is way more dangerous than kickoffs. But even still scrimmage is where the vast majority of injuries takes place. Imo, all the changes to kickoff rules is just window dressing without changing the game in scrimmage play.
 

BamaMoon

Hall of Fame
Apr 1, 2004
22,940
21,039
282
Boone, NC
I thought this was all about safety too (and that may be the primary driving force) but according to the Dallas/Las Vegas commentators, the NFL also wants to promote more exciting plays with this model instead of the glorified fair catch/uncaught ball in the EZ.
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,485
18,484
337
Hooterville, Vir.
Do you mean players were still getting hurt on all those fair catches inside the 25 yard line?

I still contend the put return is way more dangerous than kickoffs. But even still scrimmage is where the vast majority of injuries takes place. Imo, all the changes to kickoff rules is just window dressing without changing the game in scrimmage play.
I remember in the original incarnation of the XFL, it was not possible to fair catch a punt. That took a brave man to return punts in that league.
 

crimsonaudio

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 9, 2002
68,635
84,175
462
crimsonaudio.net
It's different, but I think it will mean more returns. Without the full head of steam from charging down the field, I suspect we'll see a decrease in injuries during returns as well.

So yeah, it looks weird, but I bet it will be more exciting long-term.
 

RollTide_HTTR

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2017
10,017
8,866
187
I haven't watched enough preseason to have a real opinion but visually it's jarring. If it works as intended I'll support it though
 

CrimsonNagus

Hall of Fame
Jun 6, 2007
9,672
8,573
212
46
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
All this trying to make kickoff's safer, will it actually mean much in the end? Are there metrics that say kicking plays are the most dangerous? If there are then I guess I just don't understand those numbers. When I watch football, be it NFL or college, seems like the majority of injuries happen on plays not involving kicking at all.


I watched a lot of rugby during the Olympics and I was amazed that there weren't more injuries happening all the time. Those folks were hitting hard, especially the women, with hardly any protective gear. NFL players are all but bubble wrapped and still get hurt so much. Maybe football should take a cue from rugby and strip back some of the protections so that maybe the players will learn to play in a less violent way. I honestly believe that the gear makes these players feel invincible so they do things they would never do if they were more exposed. I could also be completely off my rocker.
 

AWRTR

All-American
Oct 18, 2022
3,116
4,610
187
It's different, but I think it will mean more returns. Without the full head of steam from charging down the field, I suspect we'll see a decrease in injuries during returns as well.

So yeah, it looks weird, but I bet it will be more exciting long-term.
More kick returns would be better. A kick-off or punt returned for a TD is one of the most exciting plays in football. I've been at several Bama games with kicks returned for a TD and the stadium goes absolutely insane.
 

RollTide_HTTR

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2017
10,017
8,866
187
All this trying to make kickoff's safer, will it actually mean much in the end? Are there metrics that say kicking plays are the most dangerous? If there are then I guess I just don't understand those numbers. When I watch football, be it NFL or college, seems like the majority of injuries happen on plays not involving kicking at all.
yes. I don't remember it now but when they moved Kickoffs up there was some data showing injuries happened on kickoffs at a much higher rate. It probably seems like more injuries happen on other plays because there are way more plays that aren't kickoffs than there are kickoffs.

I actually think this change is about more than safety, it's about increasing safety while also increasing the number of returns.
 

RollTide_HTTR

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2017
10,017
8,866
187
but if no one can move on a kick, how can you even be remotely successful?
Onside kicks are likely mostly gone except for desperation situations. But the success rate was already crazy low.

I kind of wonder if they add a new rule change in a year or 2 to help onside kicks or change it to going for it on 4th down from your own 20 or something.
 

DzynKingRTR

TideFans Legend
Dec 17, 2003
46,427
36,815
287
Vinings, ga., usa
Onside kicks are likely mostly gone except for desperation situations. But the success rate was already crazy low.

I kind of wonder if they add a new rule change in a year or 2 to help onside kicks or change it to going for it on 4th down from your own 20 or something.
I look forward to sarcastaball becoming a reality.
 
Last edited:

Krymsonman

Hall of Fame
Sep 1, 2009
8,025
6,219
187
River Ridge, LA
I saw my first pre-season game last night, and it just looks completely weird to me. So, I guess if the returner muffs the catch, he'll have plenty of time to recover it. I haven't looked at all the rules on the "new" kick off, but it just looks weird to me.
 

New Posts

Latest threads