Politics: Recall of U.S. Congressmen

Crimson Speed

Hall of Fame
Oct 2, 2005
5,009
474
102
The Shoals, North West Alabama
For those having a good understanding of constitutional law, is it possible for States to recall their respective Senate and House members of U.S Congress? Could a special state election be held to replace them? If so, what is the procedure?

I realize they can be impeached or removed from office for illegal or unethical acts, but not sure if it is possible because they failed to represent the people.
 

jps1983

Hall of Fame
Aug 30, 2006
7,459
0
0
Interesting question, I have no clue, but for House members, their term is so short that replacing them is easy in the following election is probably the easiest way to do it. They can't do too much damage in 2 years...oh wait...
 

CaliforniaTide

All-American
Aug 9, 2006
3,727
167
87
Huntsville, AL
Not sure how (if at all) it would apply at the federal level, but California has recall (along with initiative and proposition) on the books, and used it to remove Gray Davis.

I suspect that removal of a congressman from office would result from some sort of a scandal/"high crimes and misdemeanors"-type of crime.
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,895
19,362
337
Hooterville, Vir.
For those having a good understanding of constitutional law, is it possible for States to recall their respective Senate and House members of U.S Congress? Could a special state election be held to replace them? If so, what is the procedure?

I realize they can be impeached or removed from office for illegal or unethical acts, but not sure if it is possible because they failed to represent the people.
There is nothing in the Constitution preventing the voters of a state from recalling a bad senator or congressmen. Unfortunately, like most issues, the centralization of control at the central government level means that the recalled member would file a suit in a Federal court and a Federal judge somewhere would step in (citing some spurious and unintended interpretation of the Constitution) to prevent the recall.
Before the Progressives screwed up the Constitution with the XVII Amendment, senators were recalled by the state legislatures who sent them to Washington.
 

Bodhisattva

Hall of Fame
Aug 22, 2001
22,476
4,010
287
Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
This is going in in NJ. The argument against recall is that the Constitution is does not say the citizens of a state can throw out a US senator or rep. Funny, I thought the Constitution was a restriction on the government, not the people.
 

HomeBrew Tider

1st Team
Aug 7, 2009
425
0
0
Atlanta, GA
This is going in in NJ.
Interesting. Here's a good rundown I found:

Meanwhile, seemingly everyone was now weighing in as a legal expert. Some insist the decision is simple: NJ has no constitutional authority to recall a US Senator; despite what its state constitution says, that authority is reserved for the federal government alone. For weeks now, legal scholars, political pundits and the media have been chattering online about the case, now before the Appellate Division in the Superior Court of New Jersey, some treating it more like a sideshow and an outlet to take pot shots at Tea Partiers than a legitimate court proceeding with real constitutional significance.

But Dan Silberstein and Richard Luzzi, attorneys for the Committee to Recall Robert Menendez, a committee initiated by members of the Sussex County Tea Party, see this case in an entirely different light. They insist this case is not about whether a recall order from the state is judicially enforceable against a United States Senator, rather, it’s all about protecting the first amendment right to free speech. And they are taking the matter very seriously. Based upon recent developments in the case, apparently so are several others, including some high profile legal experts and the courts.

Menendez NJ Recall Update: The Tea Party Goes to Court - Big Government
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,895
19,362
337
Hooterville, Vir.
from the article said:
Some insist the decision is simple: NJ has no constitutional authority to recall a US Senator; despite what its state constitution says, that authority is reserved for the federal government alone.
I beg your pardon? Only the Federal government (the recipient of the representative) can dismiss the representative, but not the people who sent him or her?
That's a little odd.
 

cbi1972

Hall of Fame
Nov 8, 2005
18,734
2,659
182
53
Birmingham, AL
I beg your pardon? Only the Federal government (the recipient of the representative) can dismiss the representative, but not the people who sent him or her?
That's a little odd.
How to Recall a U.S. Senator
The 18 states allowing for recall are as follows: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington and Wisconsin.
Not that eHow is authoritative, but it seems plausible.

There's a big argument about it here:
FYI: Yes, you *CAN* recall a US Senator and/or Congressperson - Democratic Underground
 
Last edited:

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,895
19,362
337
Hooterville, Vir.
How to Recall a U.S. Senator

Not that eHow is authoritative, but it seems plausible.

There's a big argument about it here:
FYI: Yes, you *CAN* recall a US Senator and/or Congressperson - Democratic Underground
Thanks.


I found this in the records of the NY Convention as they were debating ratification of the Constitution:
"Mr. Livingston: The Senate, as they are now constituted, have little or no check on them. Indeed, sir, too much is put into their hands. When we come to that part of the system which points out their powers, it will be the proper time to consider this subject more particularly.

I think, sir, we must relinquish the idea of safety under this government, if the time for services is not further limited, and the power of recall given to the state legislatures. I am strengthened in my opinion by an observation made yesterday, by an honorable member from New York, to this effect — "that there should be no fear of corruption of the members in the House of Representatives; especially as they are, in two years, to return to the body of the people." I therefore move that the committee adopt the following resolution, as an amendment to this clause : —

"Resolved, That no person shall be eligible as a senator for more than six years in any term of twelve years, and that it shall be in the power of the legislatures of the several states to recall their senators, or either of them, and to elect others in their stead, to serve for the remainder of the time for which such senator or senators, so recalled, were appointed."

Hon. Mr. LANSING. I beg the indulgence of the committee, while I offer some reasons in support of the motion just made; in doing which, I shall confine myself to the point, and shall hear with attention, and examine with candor, the objections which may be opposed to it.

The representation of the United States, by the proposed system, is vested in two bodies. On the subject of one of these, we have debated several days, and now come to the organization and powers of the other. I believe it was undoubtedly the intention of the framers of this Constitution to make the lower house the proper, peculiar representative of the interests of the people; the Senate, of the sovereignty of the states.

Some very important powers are given to the latter, to be executed without the concurrence of the representative house. Now, if it was the design of the plan to make the Senate a kind of bulwark to the independence of the states, and a check to the encroachments of the general government, certainly the members of this body ought to be peculiarly under the control, and in strict subordination to the state who delegated them. In proportion to their want of dependence, they will lose their respect for the power from whom they receive their existence, and, consequently, will disregard the great object for which they are instituted. The idea of rotation has been taken from the articles of the old Confederation. It has thus far, in my opinion, operated with great advantage. The power of recall, too, has been an excellent check, though it has, in fact, never been exercised. The thing is of so delicate a nature, that few men will step forward to move a recall, unless there is some strong ground for it."

It is likely that Livingston proposed this amendment because he thought the state did not already have that power.
It is possible the Convention voted this down because they were just as convinced that they had that power even without the amendment, and did not wish to make it explicit because somebody might argue that states do not have powers unless they are explicit.
In NY's ratification instrument, she wrote, "WE the Delegates of the People of the State of New York, ...Do declare and make known.
That all Power is originally vested in and consequently derived from the People, and that Government is instituted by them for their common Interest Protection and Security.
That the enjoyment of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness are essential rights which every Government ought to respect and preserve.
That the Powers of Government may be reassumed by the People, whensoever it shall become necessary to their Happiness; that every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by the said Constitution clearly delegated to the Congress of the United States, or the departments of the Government thereof, remains to the People of the several States, or to their respective State Governments to whom they may have granted the same; And that those Clauses in the said Constitution, which declare, that Congress shall not have or exercise certain Powers, do not imply that Congress is entitled to any Powers not given by the said Constitution; but such Clauses are to be construed either as exceptions to certain specified Powers, or as inserted merely for greater Caution."
 
|

Latest threads

TideFans.shop - Get your Gear HERE!

Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light

Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.