CapstoneTider said:And what if the sarcasm is returned back to you? This is why I believe sarcasm by moderators should be kept to a minimum.
Seriously, at another board there's a moderator who is constantly critizing and jumping on folks with constant sarcasm knowing good and well the same response back would result in a banning. I would prefer the moderator to take off the king's crown while posting about everyday stuff. When a moderator is needed, then put the crown back on. It's easy to see why this guy has more posts that everyone else combined, he get's to go to battle with a one arm advantage!
Not talking about you guys by the way. :biggrin:
On the subject of signiture's, I can understand your point of view. :wink:
I am actually someone who gets a chuckle out of a little dry wit and sarcasm.
Now, does it ever occur to anyone that we (moderators) may get a bit tired of replying the same redundant answer again and again in the same thread?
People too lazy to read a thread will most likely get just a hint of sarcasm should I reply. In fact I would wager most of the moderating done on this and other boards is due to someone not reading.Terry, that list is the shortest it has been since I started keeping one. I bet my list is shorter than Earle's.
