Yes, so he's no longer in a position to have to allow something that goes against his religious beliefs. No hissy-fits, no lawsuits - just stepping down.
So your position is that you're just as much a tribalist as I?
Do you have no deeply held religious beliefs? If so, would you compromise those if rules were put in place at your workplace or just 'go along' to avoid 'copping out'?
i stopped taking fundies in good faith about their public statements of “deeply held religious beliefs†a long time ago.
Noted that you didn't answer the question.
because this has nothing to do with me, it is about fundies cynically using their religion to bludgeon others
Well, it certainly helps us understand your rush to judgment.
Isn't this true of any ideology? I see far more zealotry in political ideology than I have ever seen in religion and I grew up in a fundamentalist religious background. I eventually left it and honestly don't have a lot of good things to say about it, but what I'm seeing in modern societal discourse makes them look like passive know-nothings at this point.
OK, so to recap: You decided to comment on a situation about which you, by your own admission, knew very little about. To mask your inability to make an informed argument on the situation, you went for an ad hominem attack by labeling me a tribalist.
I will give him credit for not making a fuss--it is Sanders who is making an issue of it.
That's a very bizarre and dishonest take. But, whatever works for you. Go tribe!
Because someone else made it a story?
it is being used by gov sanders that way and she is the one exploiting his “deeply held religious beliefsâ€Â. whether or not he was complicit in that or not, i don’t know and don’t really care.
