Hmmmmm.....third post, unsubstantiated barb at the playing abilities of a player who would be in the NFL now if it weren't for a late season injury, followed by bringing up an off-the-field incident. CYA by throwing a nice bone about another player. I smell a cow chips and hear a mooo coming.
Until his consistently spectacular performance over the last half of the 2010 season, I thought Julio was one of the more perplexing players we've had for a number of years.
He could make all-time highlight reel plays (one-handed diving TD catch against Kentucky; game-breaking sprint down the left sideline against LSU), but until late in his third year was good for at least one or two drops a game.
He was one tough son of a gun, playing with a broken hand, and running a surprising time in the combine on a broken foot. But it seemed like he was forever dinged up. Given his tolerance for pain, I know that if he was affected it would have brought mere mortals to their knees. But still, he was undeniably injury prone.
If it weren't for Julio's breakout in consistency during the last half of 2010, I might agree that we'd have little dropoff in the pass-catching aspect of the WR spot.
Where I think he is 100% irreplaceable is on two fronts where, no matter who the new guy is, he won't be in the same stadium as Julio was: Blocking and attracting double-coverage. Look at Ingram's TD run against Ole Miss just before the half in 2009. Julio drove his man dang near across the field. An out of shape middle-aged member of the OFC could have run through the hole he opened. Opposing defenses had to account for him on every single play, and most did it with double coverage. It helped both the other WRs and the running game.
I don't think we can replace the pure pass-catching of the last half of 2010, and am certain we can't replace the other parts of Julio's game.