Have you criticized black churches in the past who have openly supported candidates, knowing that they had a free pass?Enforcement of the Johnson Amendment would put an end to any church endorsing candidates from the pulpit. This is a move to strengthen the Christian Nationalism movement and involve the government in religious matters. This decision will allow big money donors to further influence the political landscape.
100%. Not on this site (I don't recall an occasion to do so), but I certainly have in other places, including with cantankerous family members. If religious organizations are going to be "nonprofits", then they should stay out of politics, regardless of party or ideology.Have you criticized black churches in the past who have openly supported candidates, knowing that they had a free pass?
Dead posting risk...I wouldn’t worry myself over one person’s personal opinion.
Easy fix; make contraception over the counter and problem solved. Medicaid shouldn’t be paying for this anyway.
Depending on who you ask, America's young people are experiencing a religious revival. Gen Zers are now more likely to attend church weekly than millennials, with young men in particular leading the return to religious services. While Gen Zers are still more likely to identify as religiously unaffiliated than previous groups, there's evidence that certain kinds of religious devotion are also growing in popularity—earlier this year, Roman Catholic dioceses around the Western world reported spikes in adult conversions.
As the decline in religious attendance has slowed, the past few years have also seen a clear rise in the status of religion. It's becoming more and more socially acceptable to be religious in elite intellectual spaces—something that could have a real impact on how religion is perceived by everyone else.
I found this article to be VERY interesting and it mirrors my own observations. Young Catholics, in particular, seem to be at the forefront for turning back the clock. (Something I would like to see, myself.)Religion became cool again among the educated elite once it gained an association with good aesthetics, high art, and sacred music—not Bush-era Republican soft theocracy.
Today, one can belong to the ideas-making class—an aspiring public intellectual or artist—and still be religious, so long as one steers clear of evangelical kitsch. Whether or not a real religious revival is underway in American public life, one thing is clear: The cool kids aren't the smug, strident atheists anymore—they're the Christians.
If Hegseth is running for President, that's news to me.![]()
Defense Secretary praises pastor who thinks women shouldn't have the right to vote
Pete Hegseth endorsed the views of Doug Wilson, a Christian Nationalist who openly calls for the end of women’s suffragewww.friendlyatheist.com
When Barack Obama was running for president in 2008,
This level of association with and endorsement of such a despicable character should be enough to disgrace anyone in government, but the GOP lost any such sense of morality years ago. It's simply more evidence of the craven hypocrisy from a party that rarely hesitates to crow about its supposed Christian beliefs.If Hegseth is running for President, that's news to me.
(As far as the "Trump should fire him," well, he never should have hired him, and he should have thrown him deep into a canyon when he invited a reporter onto a classified chat. If THAT doesn't lose you the job as head of the military, don't expect 19th century views that match the President's 19th century views on economics to result in anything).
Apparently great hair means your ceiling is unlimited...If Hegseth is running for President, that's news to me.
(As far as the "Trump should fire him," well, he never should have hired him, and he should have thrown him deep into a canyon when he invited a reporter onto a classified chat. If THAT doesn't lose you the job as head of the military, don't expect 19th century views that match the President's 19th century views on economics to result in anything).
This is my bad in the sense I did not notice the title of the thread. I’m sure you’re aware. I was not defending Hegseth, but given the fact we could find out that Trump financed the sacrifice of infants to Molech and he wouldn’t lose one CHRISTIAN vote, it’s just one more in a long line of frustrations.This level of association with and endorsement of such a despicable character should be enough to disgrace anyone in government, but the GOP lost any such sense of morality years ago. It's simply more evidence of the craven hypocrisy from a party that rarely hesitates to crow about its supposed Christian beliefs.
This is my bad in the sense I did not notice the title of the thread. I’m sure you’re aware. I was not defending Hegseth, but given the fact we could find out that Trump financed the sacrifice of infants to Molech and he wouldn’t lose one CHRISTIAN vote, it’s just one more in a long line of frustrations.
This does not fill this seminarian with anything but immense dread for the record.
![]()
Study says 32 million Christians likely not to vote
A new study by a researcher at Arizona Christian University says 32 million Christians who are regular churchgoers are likely to stay home this election.azcapitoltimes.com
Found this because I remember this story.