Another way of looking at it, unfortunately, is this: neither of them were good enough to carry those roles from high school to college.
Lacey was a scorer at Butler but not a great shooter. From the start at Alabama, his relative lack of athleticism limited what he could do in the open court or in a set offense.
Levi has been hindered by our absence of rebounding big men and his absence of any semblance of an offensive game. I would have thought he would become a better finisher -- your analogy of a deer is a good one -- but neither Levi or Coop have ever grown into that role. Besides, when we do run, Releford and Obasahan are almost always going to the rim.
Lacey was a scorer at Butler but not a great shooter. From the start at Alabama, his relative lack of athleticism limited what he could do in the open court or in a set offense.
Levi has been hindered by our absence of rebounding big men and his absence of any semblance of an offensive game. I would have thought he would become a better finisher -- your analogy of a deer is a good one -- but neither Levi or Coop have ever grown into that role. Besides, when we do run, Releford and Obasahan are almost always going to the rim.
I'll add something else here too: I watched Levi Randolfph and Trevor Lacy play high school basketball in Huntsville.
While Lacy is gone now, he could generates points and we miss that.
Levi was never a great shooter, but he is a great athlete and he's the type of player that needs to take the ball to the rim AND/OR run the fast break and be a finisher.
Problem is, in both cases with Levi and Trevor L., they both were not used the way they needed to be used. Lacy needed to shoot alot...it's what he did in high school and he needed a lot of touches and, frankly, considering the talent around him, deserved them IMO.
Levi has never been used the way he needs to be used IMO. He's a deer that needs to run and jump and we've got him playing a half court, pure shooters role, which he is not.
Last edited: