So you're saying this economic meltdown and spending beyond our means is the fault of women? Nicely played.
In this case we should have listened to the woman instead of the 3 stooges.
So you're saying this economic meltdown and spending beyond our means is the fault of women? Nicely played.
Not at all. You brought up the origanal sin, so I assumed you meant Eve eating the apple. There are some who like to bring up past sins of white men from way before our lifes began and think we should still pay for them. So I was just playing along those lines by saying I didn't want them blaming women today for Eve's origanal sin. Sorry if I didn't expain it well enough in the first post.
I knew what you meant. I was playing the woman comment off a bit of a stereotype, ala, shopping....I was reaching and it didn't quite work
PBS's Frontline has a very good show out now showing how congress was warned back in 98 about the scam being perpetrated on the investing public by wallstreet. Brooksley Born, who was chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, after being stonewalled by Greenspan, Ruben & Summers, took her concerns to congress but was ignored as Greenspan, Ruben & Summers routinely dismissed her concerns. There was a document called the Concept Release which strongly warned that the complete lack of regulation on OTC derivatives was setting up the economy for fraud leading to the financial crash. While Born tried to shed light on what was referred to as a 'dark market' she was blocked every step of the way and warned by the likes of Greenspan, Ruben & Summers not to release the Concept Document.
Another striking case how we were warned but ignored the warnings.
FRONTLINE: the warning | PBS
Before you dismiss the need for meaningful regulations you should follow the above link or watch the show. Wallstreet is ruled by greed that knows no bounds.
Because they are still making mountains of money. Only when the American people pull all of their money out of the banks will they consider it again. That is what prompted those regulations in the 1930s...These are nice issues put forth. I would add that no one really seems interested in reregulating the markets. Obama's plan of stopping bonuses and attack predatory lending is short of reregulating the market or abolishing derivatives and the like. The game really doesn't end, does it? Then our intermediate term future has been cast.
I would add that no one really seems interested in reregulating the markets. Obama's plan of stopping bonuses and attack predatory lending is short of reregulating the market or abolishing derivatives and the like. The game really doesn't end, does it? Then our intermediate term future has been cast.
Because they are still making mountains of money. Only when the American people pull all of their money out of the banks will they consider it again. That is what prompted those regulations in the 1930s...
relevance?
Well, I assumed that if we were going to blame George W. for everything that happened or didn't happen on his watch that we would be logically consistent with other presidents.
Must the President and Congress wait that long? If they do, there won't be any money left for the people. It's not that they don't know there is a problem. It is another sign that speaks volumes about what Washington is about. They are not about representing its citizens. There is something wrong.
I know you are mainly digging at Bodhi here but capitalism is just the machine. The greed and corruption come from man. Get rid of the greedy and corrupt men and capitalism will work just fine.
I've been watching this tonite and have concluded that Greenspan, Summers, et. Al. Need to have their ....... heads hacked off.
bama323 said:Exactly. Alot of people keep acting like Capitalism is the problem. Well, Capitalism is not perfect, but it's the best alternative. Unfortunately, with a Capitalistic system, there will be times of "adjustment" when things get out of balance. This is actually a GOOD thing, even though right now it doesn't seem that way. If we went to an alternative system, then we would still have the few people in power that are enjoying all the perks, but no one else would have squat.
These are nice issues put forth. I would add that no one really seems interested in reregulating the markets. Obama's plan of stopping bonuses and attack predatory lending is short of reregulating the market or abolishing derivatives and the like. The game really doesn't end, does it? Then our intermediate term future has been cast.
I've been watching this tonite and have concluded that Greenspan, Summers, et. Al. Need to have their ....... heads hacked off.
Posted via Mobile Device
Greenspan should be hung for allowing interest rates to stay artificially low for so long. He kept blathering about a "soft landing" for our economy, when, in reality, he was shilling for the previous Administration for political reasons. We're left with the disastrous results, and mea culpas from those who should be punished severely monetarily, or sharing a jail cell with Bernie Ebers and Madoff.
I don't know if you could get them all in our lifetime.
But...but...capitalism is the cure for all our ills...Bodhi told us so!!! :biggrin2:
True that the idea that everyone should own their own house is false and loaded with problems. OTC derivatives were used as a device to facilitate this by making money easily available to anyone who wanted a mortgage regardless of their credit worthiness.
Between the huge financial lobby and the repeated insistence of Greenspan, Ruben & Summers that no regulation was needed, congress chose to do nothing.