That is totally subjective.
Agreed. It's also totally subjective as to whether you think Johnny Manziel is the most dynamic college QB we are likely to see in a generation or two, including Cam Newton.
That is totally subjective.
I agree wholeheartedly; AJ would make history, which will be a major factor to the voters.
My comment was towards the blanket statement that playing for a championship should have more weight than individual performance.
If that was the case then Bama would have had 4 or 5 players win the Heisman.
I thought a player could not leave until after thier Jr season. What is the case with JF leaving after his sophomore season?
It's a team sport - there's no way one can simply value an individual's performance.I totally disagree. IMO, the Heisman should go to the player who, through his individual effort, elevates a team to their best effort. To me, Archie Manning is the prototypical Heisman winner.
If you are not going to give it to Johnny, then what good is the award? Barring the emergence of some phenom that we haven't seen yet, and assuming that Johnny plays at the level he did in the Bama game, he should win the award again, hands down.
In all of his actions before, during and after the Bama game he would have made me proud if I was an Aggie. He was respectful, thoughtful and knowledgable in all of his interviews. His performance on the field was spectacular. He was disappointed that they lost but was complimentary of our players and our program.
I don't get the knock against this kid other than he's a little wild and maybe a little self absorbed. He's a kid for goodness sake. So he's not Tim Tebow, and some people think you have to be squeaky clean to deserve the Heisman. I'll let you in on a little secret. There are very few Tebow's on college rosters, ours included.
A little early to be handing it out already, innit?If you are not going to give it to Johnny, then what good is the award? Barring the emergence of some phenom that we haven't seen yet, and assuming that Johnny plays at the level he did in the Bama game, he should win the award again, hands down.
Oh, how weary I am of hearing a 20 year old MAN referred to as a 'kid' as an excuse for his petulant behavior. He's a spoiled brat, and he's a fully grown man, please quit acting as if he's some toddler whose bad behavior can be attributed to his youth. Sure, his parents failed him, but at some point he has to start acting like the adult he is...I don't get the knock against this kid other than he's a little wild and maybe a little self absorbed. He's a kid for goodness sake.
A little early to be handing it out already, innit?
Good point. He could get injured; thrown off the team; etc. It IS too early.
Oh, how weary I am of hearing a 20 year old MAN referred to as a 'kid' as an excuse for his petulant behavior. He's a spoiled brat, and he's a fully grown man, please quit acting as if he's some toddler whose bad behavior can be attributed to his youth. Sure, his parents failed him, but at some point he has to start acting like the adult he is...
1st round - Raiders
That is totally subjective.
His statement was subjective - meaning that it was influenced by personal feelings. Every Heisman vote is based on subjective reasoning. No matter their mission statement, their voting methodology produces subjective results. Every voter has his own criteria.Not really,.
He seems to love playing football, but he does not want anything to do with college. He doesn't even attend classes - takes them on-line. I think he would already be gone if he had the option.
Not really, the Heisman isn't about a teams success. It's about individual accomplishments. RG3 won it with 3 losses. Here is a direct quote from the Heisman Trust...http://www.heisman.com/trust/mission_statement.php
"The Heisman Memorial Trophy annually recognizes the outstanding college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of excellence with integrity. Winners epitomize great ability combined with diligence, perseverance, and hard work. The Heisman Trophy Trust ensures the continuation and integrity of this award. The Trust, furthermore, has a charitable mission to support amateur athletics and to provide greater opportunities to the youth of our country. Our goal through these charitable endeavors is for the Heisman Trophy to symbolize the fostering of a sense of community responsibility and service to our youth, especially those disadvantaged or afflicted. All assets of the Trust beyond the expense of maintaining the annual presentation of the Heisman Memorial Trophy are reserved for such charitable causes. The Trustees, who all serve pro bono, are guided by a devotion to college football and are committed to community service and the valued tradition which the Trophy represents."
Will he win it? He might, but I'd kind of doubt it. I don't think the Heisman voters think he represented it well and they might take into account the amateur part of their "Mission Statement" because of the autographs.