VAR in soccer. I hate it. Idk if it really counts as a rule but I stand by it.
Sticking with college football...the newest rules of the clock runs on first downs, and out of bound plays for the sake of shortening the games that was never intended for that purpose, but instead to make us suffer through the repeated stupid TV commercials and self-serving network promotions.
I agree too many times targeting should be called and it’s not and too many times shouldn’t be targeting and is called because helmet slides up or something and makes minimal contact.Targeting - not because the rule isn't needed, but because it is impossible to fairly administer.
The stupidest rule in all of sports (that I've seen) is in basketball, where a guy going towards a basket plows into a guy between him and the basket, gets the basket, AND A FOUL is called on the guy who already gets hit, allowing a free throw. Yes, and I know "was he set" blah blah blah, but it's beyond stupid. And how it gets called in the higher echelons of basketball has ZERO to do with the actual rule and everything to do with "which one of these guys is the bigger superstar."
"Makes the shot AND draws the foul" my behind. Learn to shoot something besides dunks and layups.
Sticking with college football...the newest rules of the clock runs on first downs, and out of bound plays for the sake of shortening the games that was never intended for that purpose, but instead to make us suffer through the repeated stupid TV commercials and self-serving network promotions.
The modern application of roughing the passer..The complete over reaction to protect the QB in CFB & the NFL.
I agree. Way too harsh. Perhaps give the ball to the team that fumbled on the twenty. A team should not benefit from a fumble they didn't recover, imo.I nominate the rule in football where a fumble through the end zone results in a touchback and possession for the non-fumbling team on their own 20.
We’ve been the beneficiary of the rule (Tennessee Rocky Stop) and the victim (the barn in 2010, and the BC game in Boston in 83. And an LSU game early in Saban’s tenure in Tuscaloosa).
Regardless: If a player fumbles, and the loose ball crosses the goal line, then subsequently goes out of bounds through the sideline or back of the end zone, still unpossessed by either team, it should be the fumbling team’s ball at the point of the fumble.
The current rule is just too punitive. So sez me.
I don't think it is needed at all. We already have personal fouls and unnecessary roughness. Targeting was created so it would appear that they were doing something about brain injuries, but all it really does is give the offense another big advantage. It is horrible.Targeting - not because the rule isn't needed, but because it is impossible to fairly administer.
...but they should benefit from fumbling the ball? Don't fumble the ball.I agree. Way too harsh. Perhaps give the ball to the team that fumbled on the twenty. A team should not benefit from a fumble they didn't recover, imo.
...but they should benefit from fumbling the ball? Don't fumble the ball.