I can't believe this was considered a nailbiter.
It wasn't the prettiest win, but it was a win...in the SEC...away from home. I love it, RTR.
It wasn't the prettiest win, but it was a win...in the SEC...away from home. I love it, RTR.
On another positive note:
"Mark Ingram ran for a career-high 140 yards"
The Associated Press: No. 3 Alabama blitzes Kentucky 38-20 (don't know if that link will work?)
I just looked it up and found an article that says he did run for 150 against Va Tech... So who knows where they came up with this then. :conf2:I thought he ran for 150 or so against Va Tech. Regardless, 140 aint shabby at all.
If ur run defense had been its normal self this game would have been a blowout
I might be in the minority but this game really bothered me. Based on the first four games I felt like Alabama's defense could stop anyone's run. Based on that confidence I didn't see anyone on Alabama's schedule that Alabama couldn't handle. Likewise, I felt Alabama really might be the best team in the country.
Whether it's the lack of Hightower or something else, Kentucky being able to run on Alabama (and doing considerably better offensively than they did against Florida) really bothers me. I am worried what a good running team might do against Alabama now. I suppose I just took a step back in my expectations, now I'm hoping Alabama wins some of these big games instead of expecting it. I hope it was a fluke but like the lack of Alabama's offense after the Prothro injury, the difference in Alabama's effectiveness against the run was pretty signifigant.
I might be in the minority but this game really bothered me. Based on the first four games I felt like Alabama's defense could stop anyone's run. Based on that confidence I didn't see anyone on Alabama's schedule that Alabama couldn't handle. Likewise, I felt Alabama really might be the best team in the country.
Whether it's the lack of Hightower or something else, Kentucky being able to run on Alabama (and doing considerably better offensively than they did against Florida) really bothers me. I am worried what a good running team might do against Alabama now. I suppose I just took a step back in my expectations, now I'm hoping Alabama wins some of these big games instead of expecting it. I hope it was a fluke but like the lack of Alabama's offense after the Prothro injury, the difference in Alabama's effectiveness against the run was pretty signifigant.
Only the second time in Bama's history to score 30+ in the first 5 games (1920).
Roll Tide.
Only the second time in Bama's history to score 30+ in the first 5 games (1920).
Roll Tide.
Brando is WRONG.According to Tim Brando, it's the first time EVER.
They didn't run the spread. However, their wide plays out of the "I" and the like exposed the fact that we lack speed on the edge. Harris will be a really big help when it gets back, but that won't be until after OM...Spread offenses gives us fits. If it weren't for the turnovers, this game would have been real close. I wished we had a better handle on how to stop the spread. Also, kick off coverage still stinks. Way too many return yards. No style points for this game. But a win is a win! RTR!
They didn't run the spread. However, their wide plays out of the "I" and the like exposed the fact that we lack speed on the edge. Harris will be a really big help when it gets back, but that won't be until after OM...
Yep...we looked slower on the edge today. What's the latest on Harris. Have I missed something?