Looks like they are gonna let the lookout guy Janzen off.Unbelievable but not suprising for UThug.
Somehow I don't think this is the last time we'll see Janzen's name on the police blotter.
Looks like they are gonna let the lookout guy Janzen off.Unbelievable but not suprising for UThug.
Looks like they are gonna let the lookout guy Janzen off...
From what do you draw this conclusion?
That does seem to be the general consensus with most UT fans right now, and it's honestly what I expect too.
The other two will probably rot in prison somewhere, but if Jackson isn't headed to a penitentiary somewhere, Kiffin will keep him around.
We are not saying he's an innocent bystander...He was in the car at 2AM on the Strip, and there was pot in the car...Those two points right there throw out the "innocent bystander" status...We're just saying that there's a very good chance he knew nothing about the robbery (and some info is even saying he tried to stop the other two from doing it)...If the latter is the caes, I do not think that warrants kicking JJ off the team
Here's CLK's dilemma...If JJ truly had nothing to do with the robbery, then IMO, he doesn't deserve to be kicked off, but he does deserve to be suspended for the rest of year, if for no other reason that stupidity...Problem is, if he doesn't kick him off, the negative recruiting and the national media are going to be brutal bc they aren't going to tell the story that JJ had nothing to do with it bc people recruiting against us don't want others to know that and it doesnt make a good story in the media...They are going to say that JJ got to stay on the team bc he is the future All-American candidate...So becomes the question, do you kick him off for PR (even if he may not deserve it)?
I have no idea (nor does anyone other than those three and probably the coaches by this point) what happened...So, I want to be clear that I'm not saying JJ had nothing to do with it, I'm just throwing out the scenario of "what if" he had nothing to do with it?
If JJ is innocent, why would Kiffin get rid of him?
I'm trying to be careful with rocks in my glass house.
JuWan Simpson
Jimmy Johns
Jeremy Elder
...etc.
Without knowing the facts of the case, I think it is just the type of thing one might reasonably say to change a bad situation with minimal confontation."We have to get out of here" is a very different from the "What the hell are you doing? Leave these folks alone and get back to our car!" response one would expect from a surprised, unwitting bystander.
I'm trying to be careful with rocks in my glass house.
JuWan Simpson
Jimmy Johns
Jeremy Elder
...etc.
Those rocks must be in your head...JS not even close to compare...the other 2 were booted from the team next day.
Those rocks must be in your head...JS not even close to compare...the other 2 were booted from the team next day.
Without knowing the facts of the case, I think it is just the type of thing one might reasonably say to change a bad situation with minimal confontation.
I was really asking about the conclusion that JJ was the "lookout". That is pure speculation, at this point. It isn't really supported by the facts as they have been reported. It may turn out to be true, but we don't know. How often is the media wrong about this stuff? It might be easier to list the few times that they have been correct...
If JJ is innocent, why would Kiffin get rid of him?
Those rocks must be in your head...JS not even close to compare...the other 2 were booted from the team next day.
I'm sure if I were standing in front of the judge and told them I got out of the car only to realize my friends were robbing someone I would be asked why I didn't run away. I mean its not like he doesn't run a 4.4-40.
Posted via Mobile Device