I'm a bit confused by this widespread notion that Arkansas is so much improved this year.
The defense has better statistics (20 pts. less per game average compared to last year at this time), but let's be realistic about who they've played:
- An FCS school that went 6-5 last year
- A school that lost to Arkansas State by 2 TDs
- An SEC team without its top player, starting a freshman QB and a new defensive staff and scheme
Georgia had more yards against the Arkansas defense than they did against Louisiana-Lafayette. South Carolina held Georgia to almost 150 yards less total offense than did Arkansas. South Carolina also solidly beat Georgia, while Arkansas had to put on a show in the last minute of the game to pull it out after watching Georgia erase a 2 TD deficit in about a six-minute span. If 2 more minutes had been on the clock, would Arkansas have been able to stop Georgia?
Statistically, the Arkansas offense isn't as dangerous as it was last year at this time (538 ypg, 45 ppg after 2 games last season compared to 484 ypg and 35 ppg after 3 games this season).
Regarding the "make McElroy beat us with his arm" strategy... why do they believe that strategy will work better for them this season than it did last season? McElroy is far more experienced and confident, Julio is healthy and there are now more proven receivers to complement him.
I guess Arkansas is this year's fad. I expect that the announcers will fall all over themselves fawning over Mallet during the first half. By the middle of the third quarter, they'll be telling everybody how they knew that Alabama's young defense would rise to the occasion and that McElroy keeps proving himself to the doubters.