I don't think the PTB at auburn are worried at all about fired coaches telling where bodies are buried. Even if a fired coach tells something aka tator tot, auburn could have on file a signed statement where the fired coach attest he knows of no violations occurring or that occurred under his watch. Fired coach has effectively refuted in advance any future statement about a violation he may later be inclined to discuss. (Fired also being the same as getting hired away by another college).
The fired coach gets the buy out/severence pay if and only if he signs the statement. I'd guess also that the signing of a statement to get buy out money may be in the original hiring contract so as to avoid any problems on the back end of a tenure. The fired coach is in a bind, if he says he knows of violations, he can simply be fired for the violations occurring under his auspices and he gets no money. So, he has to sign that he knows of no violations or he gets no money. Slick legal move.
Disclosure: I have no direct knowledge of any wording in any coaches contract. This is conjecture supported only indirectly by past writings which vaguely referred to such contract wording. Who knows, all college coaches may be in the same boat. assuming there is such a boat???
The fired coach gets the buy out/severence pay if and only if he signs the statement. I'd guess also that the signing of a statement to get buy out money may be in the original hiring contract so as to avoid any problems on the back end of a tenure. The fired coach is in a bind, if he says he knows of violations, he can simply be fired for the violations occurring under his auspices and he gets no money. So, he has to sign that he knows of no violations or he gets no money. Slick legal move.
Disclosure: I have no direct knowledge of any wording in any coaches contract. This is conjecture supported only indirectly by past writings which vaguely referred to such contract wording. Who knows, all college coaches may be in the same boat. assuming there is such a boat???