I've intentionally refrained from commenting on this for about 12 hours or so, but even after that time I can't reach any other reasonable conclusion other than to say that, even when cast it in the absolute best light, these comments were very poorly stated and were provided with terrible timing.
And to an extent, I actually agree with Terry Saban as to the factual basis of her comments, because there is a lot of unrealistic expectations and entitlement out there now, and that's going to be the case until this whole dynasty run comes crashing to a halt (though I do think she's way off base with the whole "unappreciated" bit). Then again, what could you reasonably expect? There is no way that you are ever going to win as much as we have in such a short period of time and not have that be the case, and the same would hold true regardless of where it occurred. That's not exactly a phenomena unique to Tuscaloosa.
Two more points that I will add and then I'll shut up:
(1) Thought this was a really strange article for the Sabans to even participate in -- and rest assured Nick participated, working together with Terry to deliver a message, even if he didn't say anything on his own -- because this honestly cast them in a very bad light. This wasn't just some fluff piece for the Sabans, it was pretty brutal of their history... using everything to effectively hold schools hostage to extract all of the resources possible for the program, leaving MSU because he felt he wasn't timely paid a bonus, leaving Miami because he didn't have enough control, initially lying to MSU admins about his negotiations with LSU, learning the card game just to fit in with the families of black recruits, etc. Again, this isn't a fluff piece, and if it weren't for Terry's participation most would probably even be calling it a hit piece. Hard for me to even understand why you would participate in something like that. And frankly, it makes it very easy to cast doubt on the whole "We're not going anywhere" bit when it's stated in context of all of the other prior denials that obviously didn't hold up when push came to shove.
(2) That line about how Terry was actually in Tuscaloosa, before Nick took the 'Bama job, scoping out facilities, housing, schools, and other areas? That certainly gives some feasible credence to all of those Saban-to-Texas and Terry-Househunting-in-Austin rumors, invented and pedantic as though I'm sure they are in actuality. Again, at best very poorly worded and very bad timing.
On the upside, I honestly don't see where Saban would go, under this guise, even if he were to leave. Clearly the NFL isn't an option anymore -- Terry still wouldn't have a role, and Nick would have even less control than he had in Miami -- and while they might not like the appreciation and the expectation in Tuscaloosa, that's not going to be any different in Austin, LA, or otherwise, and it's fool's gold to think as much. Perhaps the real takeaway here is not, "Better please me or I'll leave," but "Better please me or I'll hang it up and head to Lake Burton"?
We'll see, but it will be what it will be. Earle was certainly right, though, a few pages back: For better or for worse this is going to be a very big story, perhaps even bigger than the outcome of the Iron Bowl, and if we slip up on Saturday afternoon in Jordan-Hare, this thing could easily turn into a giant mushroom cloud. Nothing may come of it in fact, but certainly the degree of speculation that will result will multiply exponentially if we don't care of business on the Plains, and we have nothing to do but wait around five weeks on some relatively meaningless bowl. At best it will turn into a huge and unnecessary distraction.