The flowchart goes 1. Beat AU 2. win West 3. win SEC 4. win NC. If you don't do number one on that list, you're probably not going to get Nos. 2, 3 and 4.
Therefore, beating Auburn becomes priority one. And really, there isn't a counterargument to that. Find me the last time Alabama won a NC without beating Auburn and we'll talk.
Secondly, you can be selective and take any year range you like, and get numbers favorable to you. Auburn has done this for years by saying "AU is x and x since 2002," or since Bryant left, but the problem isn't just 4-3. The problem is also that in all three losses, plus the 2009 win, Alabama allowed Auburn to control the emotional aspect of the game, and really make the games tougher than they ever should have been. It's not just the losses, it's the way Alabama has approached this game under Saban this is worrisome to me. The results in this series speak for themselves. When you have an alpha-omega relationship in a rivalry series, the alpha should be winning 7 of 10, if not more. Four of seven is not where you need to be.