I do think there needs to be a general consensus. Do you base strength of schedue on:
1. Rankings of the opposing teams when the game took place, or
2. Rankings of the opposing teams at the end of the season.
There are strengths and weaknesses to either argument. But we need to decide.
In keeping with my pet peeve of throwing rocks at the current situation without offering a solution, if I were made benevolent dictator of college football:
1. There are no rankings for the first 8 weeks of the season.
2. Strength of schedule throughout the year is determined by that first ranking  as in, after the 8th week of the season.
3. Yes, I know that ignores injuries after the 8th week. And it ignores drastic deterioration or improvement after the 8th week (unusual, in my experience, absent key injuries).
4. But it eliminates teams like Georgia jacking up the SOS with a Notre Dame team that turned out not to be so good, or a team using UTw’s high preseason ranking to bolster a SOS, never mind that UTw went 8-5 In the regular season in a weak B12 Conference.
5. For reasons outlined in #4, I’m willing to make the sacrifices acknowledged in #3..
Ideally, SOS would be determined after the season is over. But that by definition precludes its use during the season, I.e., for post-season purposes.
So imperfect thought it may be, so sez me.
If you think differently, I’d love to hear a better alternative....just offer one. I get enough rock-throwing without better solutions at home.