does he actually have the authority to remove the chair of the fed?
He says he does and I do not know.
does he actually have the authority to remove the chair of the fed?
He does.He says he does and I do not know.
We know you well enough from your posts on the other boards to know that you are not a troll - quite the opposite. We don't think less of you for disagreeing with us. Hopefully you won't think less of us for disagreeing with you.I came to the Politics board to perhaps have some conversation with a few conservatives here. I felt that since many posters were from the South I could find a fair amount of conservatives. That did not turn out to be the case. Perhaps instead of having the forum heading read "Enter at your own risk" It should be modified to read "Conservatives, enter at your own risk". I always try to keep an open mind in political issues and will say nobody was more critical of George W. Bush than I. So before I say anything more, and possibly become branded as an internet troll I'll say goodbye for now and return for football season.
i saw this on the wiki.He does.
The chair does not serve at the pleasure of the president, meaning that he or she cannot be dismissed by the president, though the chair can resign before the end of the term.[3]
There is the that, and then there is reality. The second that a president decides that the chairman of the fed is done, he is done.i saw this on the wiki.
He says he does and I do not know.
Several of us that you are conversing with are conservatives. Trump is an authoritarian. There’s nothing conservative about him.I came to the Politics board to perhaps have some conversation with a few conservatives here. I felt that since many posters were from the South I could find a fair amount of conservatives. That did not turn out to be the case. Perhaps instead of having the forum heading read "Enter at your own risk" It should be modified to read "Conservatives, enter at your own risk". I always try to keep an open mind in political issues and will say nobody was more critical of George W. Bush than I. So before I say anything more, and possibly become branded as an internet troll I'll say goodbye for now and return for football season.
So, are there any theories out there why this doesn’t seem to effect young kids? Normally they catch everything because kids suck at washing their hands and always stick them in everywhere.
Translation: 17-year-old girl from Santa Maria da Feira infected with coronavirus is in danger of life Paulo André 12 March, 2020 The young 17-year-old student from Santa Maria da Feira High School who is infected with the coronavirus, it is now "connected to life support machines" and "at serious risk of deathâ€Â
The information was advanced by Impala and the Observer on March 11, where it reveals that a father warned of the possibility of risk two weeks ago, however, the school did not take action and continued in normal operation. The young woman is in assisted breathing, and The diagnosed «bilateral pneumonia», one of the causes of death caused by Covid - 19.
www.bombeiros24.pt
I came to the Politics board to perhaps have some conversation with a few conservatives here. I felt that since many posters were from the South I could find a fair amount of conservatives. That did not turn out to be the case. Perhaps instead of having the forum heading read "Enter at your own risk" It should be modified to read "Conservatives, enter at your own risk". I always try to keep an open mind in political issues and will say nobody was more critical of George W. Bush than I. So before I say anything more, and possibly become branded as an internet troll I'll say goodbye for now and return for football season.
Actually only "for cause," according to the language of the statute. However, his White House team has a case in court claiming the statute is unconstitutional because it attempts to limit the power of the executive...does he actually have the authority to remove the chair of the fed?
i figured they would try to end run this. they will probably find support in the courts.Actually only "for cause," according to the language of the statute. However, his White House team has a case in court claiming the statute is unconstitutional because it attempts to limit the power of the executive...
In another few days they will pretend that they always thought this was a huge threat. And Trumpers won't question it.Ben Carson is talking now. In a very short time we've gone from "a democrat hoax" to "it's a cold/flu" to "the infections we haven't tested for and are out there will prove a lower fatality rate even though we said they weren't there two seconds ago" and now Carson calls it "a significant threat" and now says Trump will call a national day of prayer. Nothing against the last part but I'd like to see hands at work more than platitudes and hoping God will come down and do something about it.
In another few days they will pretend that they always thought this was a huge threat. And Trumpers won't question it.
Did you notice Carson coughing into his right hand and scratching his nose?Ben Carson is talking now. In a very short time we've gone from "a democrat hoax" to "it's a cold/flu" to "the infections we haven't tested for and are out there will prove a lower fatality rate even though we said they weren't there two seconds ago" and now Carson calls it "a significant threat" and now says Trump will call a national day of prayer. Nothing against the last part but I'd like to see hands at work more than platitudes and hoping God will come down and do something about it.
and they will say democrats actively blocked them from actingIn another few days they will pretend that they always thought this was a huge threat. And Trumpers won't question it.