As I have told my son, sometimes you not only have to be better than the opponent, sometimes you also have to be better than the refs.
The thing is, Milroe was protesting this as he walked off the field. He knew what down it was supposed to be...100% agreed it's there job, but it's also their job to flag a team when there are too many players on the field yet we have staff assigned to make sure we have the right people on the field to avoid a costly penalty pulling a ND against OSU.
Yes, it's the refs responsibility, but if Bama is going to maximize potential, that means you do so in every facet of the game. Even things like this. I've seen coaches / staffs catch things like this many times over the years.
Bama should have been better prepared.
Disagree.
This is literally the job of the refs.
This crew should have been suspended over this mistake. But the crew of last year's Tennessee game should have been barred from ever reffing a game again and yet they had the CBS game of the week the very next week.
You will get NO accountability from the SEC over referees. None.
Good points, for sure.I agree 100% with the last two paragraphs. And I’ll add that so long as it’s Alabama that gets the shaft, the SEC office will be like Sergeant Schultz  see noTING, hear noTING, say noTING.
I see it differently on the first two.
The down count is a critical component of the play calling decision. If the coaches don’t know what down it is, they’ll be vulnerable to calling a play that is wholly unsuited to the correct down and distance.
The coaches, especially the play caller, should always know what down it is.
I agree 100% with the last two paragraphs. And I’ll add that so long as it’s Alabama that gets the shaft, the SEC office will be like Sergeant Schultz  see noTING, hear noTING, say noTING.
I see it differently on the first two.
The down count is a critical component of the play calling decision. If the coaches don’t know what down it is, they’ll be vulnerable to calling a play that is wholly unsuited to the correct down and distance.
The coaches, especially the play caller, should always know what down it is.
Give them a bit of credit though. They've avoided the Big Ten all these years and those folks actually do not even know the meaning of numbers at all.Seems to be that Notre Dame folks just can't count.
I agree 100% with the last two paragraphs. And I’ll add that so long as it’s Alabama that gets the shaft, the SEC office will be like Sergeant Schultz  see noTING, hear noTING, say noTING.
I see it differently on the first two.
The down count is a critical component of the play calling decision. If the coaches don’t know what down it is, they’ll be vulnerable to calling a play that is wholly unsuited to the correct down and distance.
The coaches, especially the play caller, should always know what down it is.
Give them a bit of credit though. They've avoided the Big Ten all these years and those folks actually do not even know the meaning of numbers at all.
It seems that some people aren't clear as to what actually happened, as we technically didn't lose a down - though we effectively did.
From my understanding, here's what happened...
We got enough yardage to get a first down on a second down but it was originally determined - and the chains were set - as if it were third and short. The Referee realized the mistake and signaled first down but the down markers didn't get moved (corrected) before we ran a QB sneak on what we thought was a third and short, giving us a 2nd and long on the next play. The down and distance markers were then correctly moved to indicate that it was 2nd and long.
The mistake that was made by the Referee was not stopping play to explain the mistake they made with the down and distance markers - which was his responsibility.
Had we known it was 1st and 10 we wouldn't have run a QB sneak, so that is where we effectively lost a down even though we technically didn't lose one...
BoB would have run a QB sneak on 1st and goal from the 10.Had we known it was 1st and 10 we wouldn't have run a QB sneak,
Both coordinators make their play calls based on down and distance. People get paid to know that info.I agree it’s the ref’s job. Bama’s staff still should have caught it.
It seems that some people aren't clear as to what actually happened, as we technically didn't lose a down - though we effectively did.
From my understanding, here's what happened...
We got enough yardage to get a first down on a second down but it was originally determined - and the chains were set - as if it were third and short. The Referee realized the mistake and signaled first down but the down markers didn't get moved (corrected) before we ran a QB sneak on what we thought was a third and short, giving us a 2nd and long on the next play. The down and distance markers were then correctly moved to indicate that it was 2nd and long.
The mistake that was made by the Referee was not stopping play to explain the mistake they made with the down and distance markers - which was his responsibility.
Had we known it was 1st and 10 we wouldn't have run a QB sneak, so that is where we effectively lost a down even though we technically didn't lose one...
Both coordinators make their play calls based on down and distance. People get paid to know that info.
To try to catch the QB off guard on the QB sneak. It's situational football that has already been discussed. At leas TR thought it was 3rd down or the play would not have been called.Refresh my memory: But why were were going hurry up when it was unclear if we had first down or not?