good we got'em right where we want them... LANK!!!!
I haven't watched a ton of Michigan this year so I could be wrong. I need to go back and watch some of their games.
But Michigan seems to be built like a team that plays directly into our hands, at least on offense. And IIRC Penn State's QB who isn't a tenth as talented of a runner as Milroe ran on them a decent amount.
Just said the same thing to a coworker. Michigan is built to beat Ohio State. The problem is that plays into teams like Alabama and Georgia's hands.They seem to be a team that is built to beat other Big 10 teams and that's about it. Not trying to sound arrogant, it's just they really haven't beaten anyone of significance outside the Big 10 under Harbaugh.
Thank you. Everyone should read that.Interesting look at the QB numbers...
Might be a little misleading, given that in the last several games Michigan hasn't NEEDED to pass. But I still see us loading up against the run.
Me too. Underdog against UGA. Underdog against meat chicken. Will probably be the underdog to the froghorns as well. I like our chances.I love it when we are the underdog.
That was a fantastic read. I saw a Michigan poster he gave a quick run down of their offense. He’s very worried because he said their running game isn’t as Good as it seems.Interesting look at the QB numbers...
Might be a little misleading, given that in the last several games Michigan hasn't NEEDED to pass. But I still see us loading up against the run.
From what I’ve seen they have stout lines and their dline looks legit. I just don’t know about their skill positions, are they dynamic? Can they beat our secondary guys?
noFrom what I’ve seen they have stout lines and their dline looks legit. I just don’t know about their skill positions, are they dynamic? Can they beat our secondary guys?
Why are you worried about who people place bets on? It has zero effect on what happens on the field. None, nada, zip, zilch...
What were the percentages of the Georgia game?
Im not worried at all. The public at large have been dead wrong about this team since the Texas/USF debacle.
I’ll say about Michigan what beloved OL Jon Stevenson said about Ohio State prior to the 1995 Citrus Bowl: “slow, and lack of foot speed.â€Â
They were down 10 pts. when they didn’t hear FLORIDA St. #4I nearly drove off the road coming home when I heard that.
I would say that our scheme is more like a 2-4 Flex Nickel. I say that because we tend to use only 2 defensive tackles. I have watched Michigan only the last two games, but I noticed a lot of multiple TE sets. That is why I alluded to the true 3-4. Their passing game isn't scary. It is their running game that has me concerned.well, not really. in what I've watched of UM so far, they still spread out 3 receivers most of the times and also slide the TE out wide also.
Anyway, we don't run the 3-4 over/under any more. Outside of a few short yardage and goal line plays we've run the 3-4 ZERO times this year and in most games we never lined up in it at all. Our base D is a 4-2 Flex Nickel and really we're best when we don't even worry about the Flex of having an OLB able to drop and just play a 40 front. When we try to operate as a 3-3 Nickel, we get what happened on the first drive against UGA. 4-2 was the rest of the game. The only thing that's a bit of a holdover is that we still have a good bit of 2-gap responsibilities along the DL, but even that appears to be shifting to either hybrid or 1-gap.