I agree with you. This isn't some "woke" rebrand (whatever that is). This is a company trying to remain relevant between an aging loyal demographic and fickle generations of younger consumers. Whether the changes (aside from the logo) are good decisions long-term remain to be seen. I tend to think that, in this case, alienating a loyal core group that seems unable to adapt to any sort of change is a bad idea.TBH, I don't understand this one. Was the logo change some kind of woke thing, ala Aunt Jemima? The old man sitting next to the barrel could be any race. Don't see how it could be considered racist. Sounds like it was done in an effort to "modernize" the restaurant and the department responsible for the new logo failed to adequately gauge the backlash.
I hate these cosmetic procedures and botox injections. Those lip injections are especially heinous. I swear, these women think they're gonna look like Angelina Jolie, but wind up looking like Steven Tyler after an East Texas bar-brawl. I wanna wet their lips and see if they stick to a glass surface.
Loomer looks like she wants to ask "do you want to play a game?"I hate these cosmetic procedures and botox injections. Those lip injections are especially heinous. I swear, these women think they're gonna look like Angelina Jolie, but wind up looking like Steven Tyler after an East Texas bar-brawl. I wanna wet their lips and see if they stick to a glass surface.
Oy, thanks for the nightmares. She is a weirdo, so I guess it's appropriate that she looks like one.Loomer looks like she wants to ask "do you want to play a game?"
I don't know why you felt the need to bring Chelsea Clinton into this. Just let her collect her half-a-mil per year salary from the Clinton Foundation for doing nothing in peace.
sadly, it will continue to go downhill from here