Yes I did - first thing I said was 'nah' in answer to your question. Of course we can discuss his life. I just wanted to point out that there will obviously be pushback against mischaracterization (from those that are familiar with him) or hinting that he was just 'reaping what he sowed'.
I'll make it as simple as I can. In this case, I believe two things:
1. What happened to Charlie Kirk it is absolutely terrible; there should be no place for political violence in this country.
2. Charlie Kirk has increased antipathy between conservatives and liberals.
That's it. Two
separate concepts. There is no causation. No implied link between the two, no implied "well, he was just reaping the whirlwind."
If you cannot comprehend that, well, that's on you.