A lot of OL blocking schemes try to get downfield blocking advantages with big bodies. In order to do that, they won't have a blocker for the backside of a running play. It allows one of the linemen on the play side to release from the line early and start going downfield to pickup a LB or safety. To do that, linemen have to shift to the playside on who they block, leaving the backside hole unaccounted for. I've listened to former players who are now on air analyst, point this out during broadcasts.I'm about to show my ignorance on OL blocking schemes, but when the defense is in that alignment, why not just put a hat on a hat? Our center blocks the guy lined up over him, our RG chips the nose guard and moves to linebacker, our RT blocks the end. RW blocks the DB. Our #5 block the DB nearest him. Then our RB only has to make one DB miss who's coming down from the secondary. Seems more straightforward and less difficult to do IMO. But again, I know very little about OL blocking schemes.
We were also hurt by the hesitation of the running backs, allowing the backside time to catch up and make the play.A lot of OL blocking schemes try to get downfield blocking advantages with big bodies. In order to do that, they won't have a blocker for the backside of a running play. It allows one of the linemen on the play side to release from the line early and start going downfield to pickup a LB or safety. To do that, linemen have to shift to the playside on who they block, leaving the backside hole unaccounted for. I've listened to former players who are now on air analyst, point this out during broadcasts.
Did you see the running style of Kenneth Walker III in the Super Bowl...he would almost stop while waiting for the hole to open and then burst through...almost impossible to stop? I grew weary of seeing our RB's just run into the backside of the OL when the hole was one man to the left or right.We were also hurt by the hesitation of the running backs, allowing the backside time to catch up and make the play.
Maybe it should just be a hat on a hat downhill style.
Maybe that style is an attempt to make up for a talent disparity that they may no longer have. Maybe it’s just time to line up and see who wins the battles.
I suspect (again not knowing much about OL schemes) that the Seahawks were employing zone blocking schemes, which seems to play toward Walker's strength of hesitation and then hitting the open hole.Did you see the running style of Kenneth Walker III in the Super Bowl...he would almost stop while waiting for the hole to open and then burst through...almost impossible to stop? I grew weary of seeing our RB's just run into the backside of the OL when the hole was one man to the left or right.
Perhaps (last paragraph) but not all the time...our RB's could not see the hole if it was a man or 2 over from where it was supposed to be...that's on them and the RB coach.I suspect (again not knowing much about OL schemes) that the Seahawks were employing zone blocking schemes, which seems to play toward Walker's strength of hesitation and then hitting the open hole.
Much of our problem last year was RBs vision. There were times we had gaping holes and the RBs refused to run into them and #26 was the worst offender, which didn't make sense to me with his seniority.
But if they were leaving a free rusher from the end to pull (like we did at times) I don't think his hesitation tendency would work as well. One thing for sure, the Seahawks were getting some push off the LOS. Our guys didn't last year and that's one reason it seemed our RBs were running up into their backs because their backs were getting pushed into the back field.
Klint Kubiak is the son of Denver Broncos OC Gary Kubiak, who is in the Mike Shanahan offense tree, which utilizes zone blocking. Klint worked under Kyle Shanahan in San Francisco, and he still uses a zone blocking system. When run well, it gets good and great pushes on the LOS against the defensive line. When it struggles, it can be a combination of the OL and perimeter blocking (TEs, WRs). The 49ers struggled to run the ball this season when TE Kittle (a fantastic running and catching TE) was out due to injuries, and at times, the WRs struggled to their job run blocking, and Kyle Shanahan always dogged after WRs who can't run block.I suspect (again not knowing much about OL schemes) that the Seahawks were employing zone blocking schemes, which seems to play toward Walker's strength of hesitation and then hitting the open hole.
Much of our problem last year was RBs vision. There were times we had gaping holes and the RBs refused to run into them and #26 was the worst offender, which didn't make sense to me with his seniority.
But if they were leaving a free rusher from the end to pull (like we did at times) I don't think his hesitation tendency would work as well. One thing for sure, the Seahawks were getting some push off the LOS. Our guys didn't last year and that's one reason it seemed our RBs were running up into their backs because their backs were getting pushed into the back field.
I got distracted with my former post, but I came to this thread to say that I saw where AJM is sticking his neck out for our new OL hire. He thinks he's going to bring a "nastiness" we've been missing to our OL play.
I've heard that some of the contracts are up in late Feb. Maybe some changes start happening then?Has there been any word on any further additions to the coaching staff? Bryan Ellis moved from TE’s to coaching QB’s when Nick Sheridan left for Michigan State. I’m wondering if there is a plan to hire a replacement or have TE’s work with both Nix and WR’s AND Klemm at Oline?
I believe I'm correct in saying this but Kapalovic was OL coach at Michigan State when KW3 was the RB there...Did you see the running style of Kenneth Walker III in the Super Bowl...he would almost stop while waiting for the hole to open and then burst through...almost impossible to stop? I grew weary of seeing our RB's just run into the backside of the OL when the hole was one man to the left or right.
“ Maybe it should just be a hat on a hat downhill style. “ We’re FAR too sophisticated for that !We were also hurt by the hesitation of the running backs, allowing the backside time to catch up and make the play.
Maybe it should just be a hat on a hat downhill style.
Maybe that style is an attempt to make up for a talent disparity that they may no longer have. Maybe it’s just time to line up and see who wins the battles.
Lack of push by the O line HAD to be evident in practice.I suspect (again not knowing much about OL schemes) that the Seahawks were employing zone blocking schemes, which seems to play toward Walker's strength of hesitation and then hitting the open hole.
Much of our problem last year was RBs vision. There were times we had gaping holes and the RBs refused to run into them and #26 was the worst offender, which didn't make sense to me with his seniority.
But if they were leaving a free rusher from the end to pull (like we did at times) I don't think his hesitation tendency would work as well. One thing for sure, the Seahawks were getting some push off the LOS. Our guys didn't last year and that's one reason it seemed our RBs were running up into their backs because their backs were getting pushed into the back field.
Been reading some about him this morning. This is a HUGE development. Since the TE is a part of the OL, we are essentially getting another OL coach. At the 'ville, he coached several all ACC linemen and got several guys drafted. They were also top 15 in sacks allowed.Didn’t see this posted anywhere - hiring TE coach from Louisville.
Totally agree. He coached under some really good offenses and play calling at Louisville and has a lot of good OL metrics/historical tight end jobs.Been reading some about him this morning. This is a HUGE development. Since the TE is a part of the OL, we are essentially getting another OL coach. At the 'ville, he coached several all ACC linemen and got several guys drafted. They were also top 15 in sacks allowed.
I can only imagine CKD sees a team of coaches who are going to get our OL and running game in sync.
It's almost like we hired 2 coaches in 1! Nobody can say CKD isn't making some very good coaching moves!Totally agree. He coached under some really good offenses and play calling at Louisville and has a lot of good OL metrics/historical tight end jobs.
This is a guy who would have been better than Kapilovic for OL the first time around but we’re lucky he has a lot of good TE experience, too.
I didn't see a thread on the new hire, so I started one. I agree on all your points. I think this is some very positive news for the OL and running game!!!If we hire the TE ends coach along with getting Klemm. It looks like we very well may get what we all wanted and that's a double dose of OL coaching. I know Trent Richardson and AJ McDCarron are REAL high on Klemm. I watched their podcast the other day and both of them are extremely high on what Klemm can do for our OL. So that is a good sign and I hope their excitement comes to fruition. I would LOVE nothing more than to roll into 2026 with a drastically improved OL so our RB's can have a shot at displaying their talent.