Or because SC sends players to the NFL (not saying Bama doesn't), can play for one of the best Dline coaches in the country in Lawing, and can help build this team into championship caliber and be the first to do something big at this school. Make history. No, nothing wrong with that at all.
1). USCe never has been nor ever will be championship material with or without JC.
2). I take it you are a USCe fan on our BAMA board?
3). IMO we get JC anyway, so, if 1). affends you, I apologize and you can disregard it!
More of the "its all about me" generation. Yet another reason I do not worry about 18 year old kids making a decision on where they are going to play. If they come to Bama and play, fine I root for them. If they go to The University of Timbucktoo, then I could care less what they do. I certainly am way, way too old to get all in a tizzy on where some 18 year old is going to play. 18 year olds don't drive my life. (Just one old man's opinion.)
Or because SC sends players to the NFL (not saying Bama doesn't), can play for one of the best Dline coaches in the country in Lawing, and can help build this team into championship caliber and be the first to do something big at this school. Make history. No, nothing wrong with that at all.
Welcome aboard,
The question for the future of USC is not JC it is can CSS recruit outside of the state. Maybe next year if they can get to the SECCG again it will show they can sustain long term. Even with the class USC will have this year including if they get JC they are still not getting the top recruits from surrounding states and not many are even looking. JC will be good but he will start showing how good he is his sophmore year. The same year that will see Garcia, Gilmore, Jeffreys and many others gone before the season starts. Alot fo teams have picked up a few great players but you need more then a few and have to get kids out of state. No offense but even Clemson with the turmoil in their program for whatever eason is landing top out of state players. Until USC does that they maybe have one more good year, because after that UF, UGA, and UT will be player agian in the SEC East.
I remember Hardy(I think was his name) at Ole Miss. Great defensive player but had nothing around him.
TT, we accept visitors from other schools on this board. What he has stated has merit and in no way has he been disrespectful of Alabama. You are new to this board so you may not realize that those of us on this board treat diferring opinions with respect.
USC3521, welcome and I do hope that you continue to post on this board.
Thanks for the civil feedback Tide Warrior. We like you over at cockytalk. Don't be so fooled by the star rankings though. Yes Clemson is raking in some highly rated talent as they have done for the past few years. Unfortunately for them (and it is really obvious to people who are not Clemson fans), they lack in the coaching aspect and have ever since Bowden has been there. Their offensive line lacks quality young players and you can't do anything without an offensive line (us gamecock fans know). It doesn't matter how high of a class you have if you can't develop your talent.
Back to the topic, the cupboard won't be bare after next year. Yes, Jeffery will probably go pro but believe me we have more great players next in line. Our class may lack in stars, but our coaches aren't settling on anything. They've gone out and gotten the players they wanted and them some. SOS admitted he's going after players with certain qualities now and not just anyone with 4 or 5 stars by their name. It helps when you have a great D-coordinator like Ellis Johnson handpicking his recruits for his system. No worries there.
All this being said, Clowney has the opportunity to make a Lattimore-like impact for the defense. A lot of people though Latti wouldn't be able to do anything on our team and we saw what happened there. Clowney will succeed where ever he goes and I hope everything I've heard is true and he becomes a gamecock.
I agree about Clemson it is sort of like the Twilight Zone over there, but that staff's days are limited. I think next year will determine USC though. If they can repeat I think the players out of state will start looking. This open some eyes but next will tell the tale. Will USC be the USC of the past or the new USC. Time will tell.
UA is where it is because of national recruiting, if we had to rely on just instate recruits we would be top 20 but probably not in BCS contention each year.
Welcome USC3521!
Sometimes it is great to be delusional about your team, it seemed to really help the barn, since they have been saying they will win the title every year for the past 53.![]()
So South Carolina has no shot at a championship? Which team was in the SEC championship this year? Granted the East was down, but we competed for a championship last year and we will again next year. He can come in and start right away opposite of projected first round pick Devin Taylor and succeed very well there.
The SECW has overtaken the SECE as the dominant Division, and the gap is fairly wide right now. I think most rational fans get that. But that is actually to USC's advantage. UGA is a mess to the point that they have had trouble luring top assistants the past few years. I think UF made a good hire, but the product they put on the field this year was a disaster (remember, USC beat them by 22... at the swamp). UT showed some life at the end of the season against the weaker part of their schedule, but I'm just not sold on Dooley, he's a Mike Shula clone if you ask me. KY's offense has been depleted (Locke, Hartline, Cobb all gone), and I don't see them or Vandy overtaking USC, much less rising to the top of the SECE. USC has some strong offensive talent returning next season, including arguably the two best returning offensive players in the conference (Jeffery & Lattimore). There is an open window for USC to climb up the SEC ladder, particularly the SECE. Catching up to the SECW will take more than a few 5* signees and an appearance in the SECCG, but the SECE is ripe for the taking. Now given USC's history they may blow this opportunity, but the opportunity is clearly there.
The SECW has overtaken the SECE as the dominant Division, and the gap is fairly wide right now. I think most rational fans get that. But that is actually to USC's advantage. UGA is a mess to the point that they have had trouble luring top assistants the past few years. I think UF made a good hire, but the product they put on the field this year was a disaster (remember, USC beat them by 22... at the swamp). UT showed some life at the end of the season against the weaker part of their schedule, but I'm just not sold on Dooley, he's a Mike Shula clone if you ask me. KY's offense has been depleted (Locke, Hartline, Cobb all gone), and I don't see them or Vandy overtaking USC, much less rising to the top of the SECE. USC has some strong offensive talent returning next season, including arguably the two best returning offensive players in the conference (Jeffery & Lattimore). There is an open window for USC to climb up the SEC ladder, particularly the SECE. Catching up to the SECW will take more than a few 5* signees and an appearance in the SECCG, but the SECE is ripe for the taking. Now given USC's history they may blow this opportunity, but the opportunity is clearly there.
Sorry guys I thought this was the Jadeveon Clowney thread.