BREAKING CFP moving to straight seeding this year.

CrimsonNagus

Hall of Fame
Jun 6, 2007
9,666
8,553
212
46
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
College Football Playoff going to new straight seeding model - ESPN

This is the way it should have always been. No more #9 and #11 teams jumping to #3 and #4 just because they won their weak conference championships.

So many people on r/CFB are mad at this decision. Folks on Reddit have always held conference championships too high. Just because you win in a weak conference doesn't mean you are better than other non-conference champs.
 
Last edited:

TitleWave

All-American
Dec 3, 2012
3,278
926
132
Pope Bob, er Leo XIII drawing them out of a bingo spinner is being considered as a more ecumenical RPO seeding selection process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tidewater

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
38,382
33,536
287
55
College Football Playoff going to new straight seeding model - ESPN

This is the way it should have always been. No more #9 and #11 teams jumping to #3 and #4 just because they won their weak conference championships.

So many people on r/CFB are mad at this decision. Folks on Reddit have always held conference championships too high. Just because you win in a weak conference doesn't mean you are better than other non-conference champs.
What's so hilarious is how that "a conference championship means something" went right by the wayside. This means every single one of them that says this needs to be hunted down with their comments from 2011, 2016 (Ohio St), and 2017 and forced to explain the inconsistency.

I don't even know Tim Brando's take, but I'll guarantee you it's inconsistent. I watched his old TV on the CBS Sports Network religiously (one religious view I abandoned, ha ha), and over and over he would rant about the need for his "Blue Ribbon Panel," as if they were going to drink Pabst's nasty tasting beer and rank football teams. But the moment we got one, he whined like a little baby about "Bama playoff privilege." Wait - YOU wanted the panel, but then when the panel gave a result you didn't like, you blamed the panel for not giving you what you wanted!!!

I have zero reason - ZERO - to even watch a college football game ever again. Ever. I tune in games and have no idea which two teams are playing because of this constant uniform change nonsense (a few years back I tuned in an Iowa State game and they were wearing IIRC charcoal gray and pink......I thought we had some Hiroshima survivors on the field.

Move to the Bowl Alliance? Good
Move to the Bowl Coalition? Good

Neither was great, but they were immense improvements over "well, Washington HAS to play in the Rose Bowl and CANNOT play Miami." Except, of course, the Rose Bowl conferences were excluded.

Then we got the BCS, another improvement.

I would even consider the CFP four-team an improvement, although I disagreed with the process of human gatekeepers flying into Grapevine, TX to pad their expense accounts and talk about sports some of them never played.

And for the record ONCE UPON A TIME I advocated:
a) conference championship requirement
b) 16-team playoff
c) relegation out of FBS like in soccer

For the record, I sat down and considered the ramifications of the consequences is why I abandoned those. That 2011 Alabama vs LSU game that transfixed a country would have meant NOTHING if we could all say, "Look, the "real" game is coming in the rematch in six weeks in the second round of the playoffs." I know critics said, "That game didn't matter," but just the opposite happened: after that game was over, all of a sudden, Oregon vs USC, Boise vs TCU, Oklahoma vs Baylor, Okie St vs Iowa St, Bedlam, and LSU vs Arky ALL MATTERED MORE. I watched ALL of those games when I rarely watched any non-SEC football...with my nerves jangling even. (The fall of 2011 - with the final day of the baseball season, the World Series my Rangers lost in a heartbreak, and the emotion and fervor of Alabama football post-tornado combined with the 'we need help' anxiety - brought me a rush like nothing since the 1991 Atlanta Braves).

I quit watching the NFL fifteen years ago except for an occasional playoff game. Two years ago, the Super Bowl was the ONLY NFL game I watched the ENTIRE SEASON - and I barely paid attention, I just couldn't find another show on I wanted to see.


It's big for gamblers. I don't gamble.
It's big for these 18-year-old mature kids who need a safe space with their million dollar paychecks and ten cent intellects. I'm not that, either.

But to give you some idea........I'm so out of touch with CFB that I didn't even know we started with Florida State this year until just last week. I'm in Chicago and talked to my Oregon bud (who grew up a Notre Dame fan) about coming to USC-Notre Dame in South Bend. We both laughed and thought, "You know, 15-20 years ago this would have been a way to check the bucket list. Who even cares?"

I'm not telling anyone that is how THEY should feel - but once upon a time I used to eat at Applebee's about once a week. Had 4-5 things on their menu that I really loved. Gradually, they took them all away one after the other even though I kept finding new things I'd like. Then in 2002, they switched to Pepsi from Coke. And lost a customer.
 

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
38,382
33,536
287
55
Collegiate sports, especially major college football, is run by morons.
Let me tell you what this all reminds me of: it's basically sorta like MLB under Bud Selig.

Everyone who was a fan recalls the Steroid Era. It was OBVIOUS what was going on. But the players and owners basically conspired together to defraud the public. The players union went to the mat to avoid ever getting ANY kind of drug testing (Marvin Miller was as bad on drugs as he was good on player salaries), and the owners, having been beaten at every turn on drug testing, bit their tongues and went along by looking at the sky high fan interest in the sport after their strike killed the 1994 World Series. Fans to this day blame Selig, but he was BOTH a co-conspirator and a guy who really couldn't make anyone urinate in a cup even if he wanted. But even on the issues where he had more pull, he screwed EVERY DAMN ONE OF THEM up and made the game more of a joke. He had an ASG where both teams ran out of players, so his solution was to make the winner of the ASG the host league for the WS. He expanded the playoffs FIRST as an owner (1994 wildcard rule) and then as a commissioner with the "let's ensure AT LEAST ONE of Boston/New York/Los Angeles/Chicago gets a team in the play-in game." His successor has managed to make Selig look like Abraham Lincoln reputation-wise by comparison.

CFB right now is the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TideEngineer08

Latest threads