Chik-Fil-A Thread

Don't get your panties in a wad. There had been a trend of civility until your post.

Had you been following this discussion, you would have seen that it was based upon the assumption that homosexuality was predetermined at birth.

I assumed you knew what we were discussing but I should've known better.


LOL. My panties are not in a wad. I was trying to help you with your reading comprehension. :smile:

OMG I never thought my opinions would be treated with such disrespect by my TideFans brothers!! :biggrin:


 
LOL. My panties are not in a wad. I was trying to help you with your reading comprehension. :smile:

OMG I never thought my opinions would be treated with such disrespect by my TideFans brothers!! :biggrin:



Just tell me why you think straight serial killers are better than gay serial killers and I'll drop it.
 
528603_270185379753871_901632571_n.jpg
 
Just tell me why you think straight serial killers are better than gay serial killers and I'll drop it.

I don't think either are better. My point was regarding God determining individuals behavior at birth. I used the sociopath as an example. Nothing more. I even said in the post I was not equating the two.

I was trying to point out that I did not believe God was determining anyone's behavior at birth regardless of said behavior.

A poster was saying the gay individual was made so by God at birth and thus should be treated with love, etc. I said God didn't determine anything at birth. The human brain for whatever mostly unknown reason determines much of what we become. Not all, but much. That's all.
 
Last edited:
I don't think either are better. My point was regarding God determining individuals behavior at birth. I used the sociopath as an example. Nothing more. I even said in the post I was not equating the two.

I was trying to point out that I did not believe God was determining anyone's behavior at birth regardless of said behavior.

A poster was saying the gay individual was made so by God at birth and thus should be treated with love, etc. I said God didn't determine anything at birth. The human brain for weahtever mostly unknown reason determines much of what we become. Not all, but much. That's all.

That's just how I troll. (You deserved it)

But seriously, I think in the not too distant future we will be stunned by the degree to which genetics determines behavior. Very interesting research these days, and I consider genetics to be the Creator speaking firsthand.
 
OK. Carry on.

BTW, I personally do not care who gets married to who for whatever reason. Be it straight, bi, tri, quad or quintsexual.

I was disappointed the thread turned into a bible study competition.
 
Paul makes it pretty clear in Galations that we are not to follow the law of the Old Testament anymore, in any way. He goes so far as to say that it was "nailed to the cross" when Christ died. And that is pretty damning. Under the law, dying by the cross was seen as the ultimate sinful death. It was, in essence, the worst way to go from a spiritual stand point. Not only did Jesus himself go that way, but he took the law with him. At least, that's how I interpret Paul's writings in Galations.

Again, I go back to the point, love not sin. Love, not law. Certainly just my opinion.

The OT contains moral, civil, and ceremonial law. The ceremonial law was fulfilled on the cross and is no longer applicable. Civil laws changed with civilization. God's moral law was not abolished or fulfilled. I got in on this thread a little late, so I won't comment on Chickfila. It has been thoroughly discussed:)
 

The Obama Administration helped oust Mubarek by not helping Mubarek and had nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood winning power there, as the Administration made its preference of other parties well known.

Not sure where the $1.5 billion claim comes from.

But since when has truth gotten in the way of riling up the base?
 
The Obama Administration helped oust Mubarek by not helping Mubarek and had nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood winning power there, as the Administration made its preference of other parties well known.

Not sure where the $1.5 billion claim comes from.

But since when has truth gotten in the way of riling up the base?

And they cant even spell "Chick"
 
The Obama Administration helped oust Mubarek by not helping Mubarek and had nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood winning power there, as the Administration made its preference of other parties well known.

Not sure where the $1.5 billion claim comes from.

But since when has truth gotten in the way of riling up the base?

http://www.kuna.net.kw/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=2232075&language=en

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/295501/obama-funds-egyptian-government-andrew-c-mccarthy

Funny, I could not find where this was reported by Think Progress or moveon.org.
 

Think Progress: http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/03/29/455280/egypt-82-percent-us-aid/
Gallup: 82 Percent Of Egyptians Oppose U.S. Economic Aid | Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last week signed off on $1.3 billion in military aid to Egypt despite the country’s poor human rights record since the revolution more than a year ago. Gallup released a poll today finding that a large majority of Egyptians are skeptical of American assistance. According to the poll, 82 percent said they oppose the United States sending economic aid to Egypt, “up 11 percentage points since December and up 30 points since April 2011 when Gallup first posed the question.”

Kinda old & not really the same. Nothing at move on but I think move on is mostly inside the USA stuff
 
OK. Carry on.

BTW, I personally do not care who gets married to who for whatever reason. Be it straight, bi, tri, quad or quintsexual.

I was disappointed the thread turned into a bible study competition.

That is apparently the context most people view this topic from. Not all but most I think.

The OT contains moral, civil, and ceremonial law. The ceremonial law was fulfilled on the cross and is no longer applicable. Civil laws changed with civilization. God's moral law was not abolished or fulfilled. I got in on this thread a little late, so I won't comment on Chickfila. It has been thoroughly discussed:)

I think the link 92tide posted on about page 46 of this thread addresses the "moral" aspect of this very well from a Christian perspective. It's worth a visit IMO. the video is an hour long but very well done. Most might disagree with his conclusions but it is how I feel about the topic.
 
Think Progress: http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/03/29/455280/egypt-82-percent-us-aid/
Gallup: 82 Percent Of Egyptians Oppose U.S. Economic Aid | Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last week signed off on $1.3 billion in military aid to Egypt despite the country’s poor human rights record since the revolution more than a year ago. Gallup released a poll today finding that a large majority of Egyptians are skeptical of American assistance. According to the poll, 82 percent said they oppose the United States sending economic aid to Egypt, “up 11 percentage points since December and up 30 points since April 2011 when Gallup first posed the question.”

Kinda old & not really the same. Nothing at move on but I think move on is mostly inside the USA stuff

So that refutes the other post about "truth" and "riling up the base."
 
Granted, it's been a while since we had a mega thread on The Holy Bible. I s'pose we need to shake off the cobwebs every now and then.
 
Granted, it's been a while since we had a mega thread on The Holy Bible. I s'pose we need to shake off the cobwebs every now and then.

Why don't we have a streaming service here on the site? Different member leads it each week. Mandatory attendance!! :)
 
Think Progress: http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/03/29/455280/egypt-82-percent-us-aid/
Gallup: 82 Percent Of Egyptians Oppose U.S. Economic Aid | Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last week signed off on $1.3 billion in military aid to Egypt despite the country’s poor human rights record since the revolution more than a year ago. Gallup released a poll today finding that a large majority of Egyptians are skeptical of American assistance. According to the poll, 82 percent said they oppose the United States sending economic aid to Egypt, “up 11 percentage points since December and up 30 points since April 2011 when Gallup first posed the question.”

Kinda old & not really the same. Nothing at move on but I think move on is mostly inside the USA stuff

Can you blame them for being skeptical? Our policies in the Middle East generated a lot of the turmoil there.
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads