I’m no football expert by any means and I’m not defending Grubb but with all the O/line rotations used, lack of push, missed blocks, whiffed blocks, pulls without contact, etc kinda begs the question could the personnel execute the plan. Was much of the blame on Grubb and CKD or lack of the right tools in box? And our RB’s were really reluctant a lot to HIT THE HOLE and I’m pretty sure it was largely due to lack of confidence that the hole would develop or stay open. I’ve seen a lotta posts and comments about getting CKD’s players will make his offense better. Again, I’m no expert. It’s a real question on my part.
Certain plays being called in certain situations (regardless of execution) didn't even make any type of football sense. For example, regardless of execution, when it is 2nd and 12 and your offensive line hasn't shown one ounce of life in run blocking all game and you call a run up the middle. Or, it is third and short and we're running sideline to sideline trick plays where the ball has to change hands two to three times before we even make a move toward the LOS. Those are stupid playcalls regardless of the execution.
