So far on this board we have seen nothing but raves about our recruiting and denigrating remarks about Auburn's recruiting. (2009)
I have looked over the lists to date and, quite frankly, they look a lot alike. Neither could do much bragging at this time. Both have a few four stars but mostly threes.
Would someone who really knows recruiting please explain how our collection of mostly three stars is better than their collection of mostly three stars?
I have looked over the lists to date and, quite frankly, they look a lot alike. Neither could do much bragging at this time. Both have a few four stars but mostly threes.
Would someone who really knows recruiting please explain how our collection of mostly three stars is better than their collection of mostly three stars?
Last edited: