Re: FBI Probe of College Basketball Players, Coaches, and NBA Agents
Is the 2 players from Auburn going pro.
Is the 2 players from Auburn going pro.
Is the 2 players from Auburn going pro.
Is the 2 players from Auburn going pro.
I agree mostly but I can see why the NCAA is responding in this way. The player likely knows it's going on but may not have much leverage to keep his affiliates from trying to profit from his skills. We are basically in a lot of cases asking a kid to confront a mom, dad, grandparent or uncle into not engaging in this behavior that would jeopardize his eligibility and no one wants to see the kid lose his only opportunity at an education.Not that the NCAA is adverse to going down a slippery slope, but the Purifoy ruling is a bad precedent. What they are essentially saying is that it's wrong for a player (or his representatives) to take money from whatever source, but if you do, and we catch you, you no longer forfeit your 'amateur' status. You'll sit out some games and eventually be reinstated. Meaning the punishment, while perhaps a bit more than a slap on the wrist, isn't career ending - not much of a deterrent. This wasn't accidental - like a meal or a car ride - it was done intentionally and knowingly. With the threat of permanent banishment removed, where's the incentive to comply with the rules? It took an FBI probe to uncover this episode and there certainly won't be one of those every year.
More punishment than Cam Newton got for taking money.Not that the NCAA is adverse to going down a slippery slope, but the Purifoy ruling is a bad precedent. What they are essentially saying is that it's wrong for a player (or his representatives) to take money from whatever source, but if you do, and we catch you, you no longer forfeit your 'amateur' status. You'll sit out some games and eventually be reinstated. Meaning the punishment, while perhaps a bit more than a slap on the wrist, isn't career ending - not much of a deterrent. This wasn't accidental - like a meal or a car ride - it was done intentionally and knowingly. With the threat of permanent banishment removed, where's the incentive to comply with the rules? It took an FBI probe to uncover this episode and there certainly won't be one of those every year.
Not that the NCAA is adverse to going down a slippery slope, but the Purifoy ruling is a bad precedent. What they are essentially saying is that it's wrong for a player (or his representatives) to take money from whatever source, but if you do, and we catch you, you no longer forfeit your 'amateur' status. You'll sit out some games and eventually be reinstated. Meaning the punishment, while perhaps a bit more than a slap on the wrist, isn't career ending - not much of a deterrent. This wasn't accidental - like a meal or a car ride - it was done intentionally and knowingly. With the threat of permanent banishment removed, where's the incentive to comply with the rules? It took an FBI probe to uncover this episode and there certainly won't be one of those every year.
Know the discussion has already been had, but I continue to struggle with the NCAA saying a player is ineligible for a year then can be reinstated. If a player is ineligible, said player can no longer player. What the NCAA is doing is suspending these guys for a length of time while calling them ineligible.
I know it's just semantics but still bugs me.
learned that D.Mitchell is transferring.
The FBI probe thread becoming the default Auburn basketball discussion location cracks me up.
https://sports.yahoo.com/new-charges-college-hoops-corruption-case-mean-182225446.html
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well it would be sort of crass for me to start an all things Auburn roundball thread on your board, so I've just taken to updating and answering questions here.
What are the mods saying on AU boards about so many guys declaring? Are they testing the waters like Braxton Key did or are they serious about going pro?