Yep, this article makes it sound like the protocols are the problem, not the inspectors. At the very least, more should be fired, including Mr. Hill. If no one else is going to be fired and ArDOT changes their protocols, then maybe Mr. Frazier deserves to get his job back. If the protocols are not sufficient to see all parts of the bridge then I'm not sure any inspector is at fault. The picture on Frazier's ipad showed no crack from his vantage point (if true). If they followed protocols then how are they at fault? Wouldn't be surprise to see a law suit from Mr. Frazier in the future.