Independent of what you think Mike Shula "deserves," how legitimate you believe the oft-repeated excuses are, etc., how many here believe--deep down--that Mike Shula is the long-term answer for our football program?
I cant' help but wonder what could have been if Shula had approached every game with this same mentality.
Could I get some of what you're having? Cause that is spot on in my book. It is, IMO, this NFL fact that is causing him the biggest headaches. For the life of me, I don't understand how Kines, Radar, and Woods have not made needed dents in that mentality by now though.I'd like to see this thread stay up. In the past, people have gotten so emotional, on both sides of the question, that the thread has had to come down. Tonight showed that he can really call a game, when his back is against the wall. Our only chance was to play with our backs to the wall and that's the way he called and we played. It does leave you with the "what if" question. All in all, we need a return to college methods. To a great extent, our team is run like an NFL franchise, which it is not. Replacing assistants alone won't solve that problem...