Issues in Education

One of my chirruns graduated college last week (aerospace engineer) and this child felt that most of the classmates relied far too heavily on Ai for help, to the point that even those with the highest GPAs came to my child for help in solving problems that Ai couldn't help. To be fair, my child was no slouch academically (cum laude), but was likely the most well-learned of the entire class due to the lack of reliance on Ai.

This experience (and that of my other children) made it plainly obvious that many college kids are over-relying on this technology (to their own long-term detriment, most likely).

IIRC, @Huckleberry teaches middle school science - I'm assuming Ai use is rampant even at that age at this point, but am curious what his experience has been to date.
I am a middle school science teacher, at least for a little while longer. I’m heading back to 4th grade next year. That's my favorite age to teach.

AI is a problem in my classes, but 6th-8th isn't getting hit nearly as hard as high school (yet), and certainly nothing like higher ed.

My wife teaches high school history, and she has to guard against cheating all the time on work done outside the classroom. If it’s an essay, short response, discussion post, or anything that asks students to explain an idea, AI can basically do the work for them.

But college is getting hammered by this even more. A lot of students don’t want in-person classes anymore. They want online classes because they know they can use AI to get through the work. That’s especially true in math, where AI can walk them through problems, give answers, and make it look like they understand something they may not get at all. And too many instructors are participants in the process. They assign online work, take-home essays, or other at-home work, then seem outraged (or worse, don't really care) when students use every tool available to avoid doing the actual thinking.

My cousin is a college English professor, and he is even more worried. He doesn’t just think AI is making cheating easier. He worries that his whole profession may not exist in a few years, at least not in the way it does now. When assignments can be outsourced instantly, it degrades the whole point of teaching (and stops real learning in its tracks). And kids are becoming experts at disguising the deception. Instantly accessible advice on Reddit can walk them through the process. The high grade is becoming all that matters, no matter how it's achieved. Real learning isn't important to a lot of them anymore, even from the perspective of some really bright students.

In middle school science, it’s a little different, but I still see it. Students who can barely explain something in class will suddenly turn in a polished paragraph with wording that sounds nothing like them. They’ll copy questions into AI, get their answers, change a few words, and submit it as their own. It's way too easy to pull off and becoming more and more accepted by peers and overlooked (or ignored) by parents.

I’m certainly not against AI as a tool, but I’ve already seen how quickly it goes from “help me understand this” to “do this for me.” And the more society is willing to move work online and out of the classroom, the worse that will get. We're headed down a dark path and it's not going to be easy to change course.
 
I am a middle school science teacher, at least for a little while longer. I’m heading back to 4th grade next year. That's my favorite age to teach.

AI is a problem in my classes, but 6th-8th isn't getting hit nearly as hard as high school (yet), and certainly nothing like higher ed.

My wife teaches high school history, and she has to guard against cheating all the time on work done outside the classroom. If it’s an essay, short response, discussion post, or anything that asks students to explain an idea, AI can basically do the work for them.

But college is getting hammered by this even more. A lot of students don’t want in-person classes anymore. They want online classes because they know they can use AI to get through the work. That’s especially true in math, where AI can walk them through problems, give answers, and make it look like they understand something they may not get at all. And too many instructors are participants in the process. They assign online work, take-home essays, or other at-home work, then seem outraged (or worse, don't really care) when students use every tool available to avoid doing the actual thinking.

My cousin is a college English professor, and he is even more worried. He doesn’t just think AI is making cheating easier. He worries that his whole profession may not exist in a few years, at least not in the way it does now. When assignments can be outsourced instantly, it degrades the whole point of teaching (and stops real learning in its tracks). And kids are becoming experts at disguising the deception. Instantly accessible advice on Reddit can walk them through the process. The high grade is becoming all that matters, no matter how it's achieved. Real learning isn't important to a lot of them anymore, even from the perspective of some really bright students.

In middle school science, it’s a little different, but I still see it. Students who can barely explain something in class will suddenly turn in a polished paragraph with wording that sounds nothing like them. They’ll copy questions into AI, get their answers, change a few words, and submit it as their own. It's way too easy to pull off and becoming more and more accepted by peers and overlooked (or ignored) by parents.

I’m certainly not against AI as a tool, but I’ve already seen how quickly it goes from “help me understand this” to “do this for me.” And the more society is willing to move work online and out of the classroom, the worse that will get. We're headed down a dark path and it's not going to be easy to change course.
Is AI part of Mississippi's sudden jump in reading scores?
 
No, I’ve listened to some podcasts on the sudden jump. They went back to teaching phonics beginning in early elementary school. This has been all but abandoned in other states, including Alabama.
They also had a state wide test that had to be passed to move to the next grade. I think it was around 4th or 5th grade.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: rolltide_21
University of California STEM professors want standardized tests back due to severe math deficiencies among students:“We now observe preparation gaps so severe that instructors must reteach middle school mathematics”“The current admissions metric, based primarily on GPA & essays, can no longer reliably distinguish readiness for university-level STEM majors in an era of severe grade inflation & AI assisted application essays”

1779836140364.png1779836151250.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Con
University of California STEM professors want standardized tests back due to severe math deficiencies among students:“We now observe preparation gaps so severe that instructors must reteach middle school mathematics”“The current admissions metric, based primarily on GPA & essays, can no longer reliably distinguish readiness for university-level STEM majors in an era of severe grade inflation & AI assisted application essays”
I wonder how many of these STEM professors will be culled as a result of this.
 
HJP3r5FWkAAtARB
 
Yale fully reinstates its pre-pandemic SAT/ACT requirement in admissions.

“These test scores are strong predictors of a student’s future Yale academic performance, and there is evidence that they are less subject to bias than other elements of an application. Previously, the office’s test-flexible policy permitted applicants to fulfil the testing requirement with scores from four options: ACT, Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), or SAT. That policy, announced in 2024, followed four years of a fully test-optional policy, adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This week’s announcement restores the policy in place prior to 2020. Academic excellence is the foundation of the Yale College experience, and, likewise, is the core component of our admissions process.”
- Yale College Dean Pericles Lewis



1779976440080.png
 
Idk if it has been posted her but these "Alpha Schools" that I am suddenly getting pushed on social media seem like a terrible idea to me.
 

Honka's classroom instruction first came into question during the 2023-24 school year. She had received the highest possible rating in district assessments the prior three years. But then students approached other teachers and complained about skits in Honka's class in which they were asked to kiss one another.

According to the independent review, issued on April 30th, a copy of which was obtained by CBS Colorado, those students were always the same sex.

One student interviewed directly in the independent review also testified that Honka always selected girls to act in the skits. Despite a nearly 50/50 split among boys and girls in the class, the student "could not recall Honka choosing a boy actor."

This student refused to participate and testified that she received a zero score for a grade on this assignment.
 
This seems pretty simple to me. A teacher should not be putting kids in a position where they have to decide, in front of the whole class, whether they are willing to kiss someone or not. Saying there were “alternatives” doesn’t fix it when the assignment was graded and the classroom rule was apparently “the answer is always yes.” Inappropriate is inappropriate.

Skits are fine. This skit was not. And this does not need to become some culture war argument about her being gay or the kids being Christian. The problem is poor judgment. Students should not be pushed into sexualized or embarrassing situations in a language class, and teachers should not be dumping deeply personal trauma on students and calling it rapport.

She had due process. The district investigated, there was an independent review, she appealed, and the board voted. Based on what’s described here, firing her sounds justified.
 
Idk if it has been posted her but these "Alpha Schools" that I am suddenly getting pushed on social media seem like a terrible idea to me.
Add to this the cost.

Elite American colleges are entering a new territory: A six-figure-per-year price tag

If I got admitted to Yale/Princeton/Harvard and had to pay $100k a year, I'd probably bite the bullet and go. That credential is a doorway to employment in elite circles of government, business, science. Below that level of prestige, the cost-benefit analysis gets tougher. If I had to pay $100k a year at Rutgers, I'd pass.
If I was a seventeen year old today, I'd live with my folks (live under their roof, eat their food, use their washing machine), save money, attend community college for two years, and then go to the best state school I could get into. My eventual diploma would say "UVA" (or "JMU" or "Va Tech") where I had finished, not "Blue Ridge Community College" where I had begun.
 
Add to this the cost.

Elite American colleges are entering a new territory: A six-figure-per-year price tag

If I got admitted to Yale/Princeton/Harvard and had to pay $100k a year, I'd probably bite the bullet and go. That credential is a doorway to employment in elite circles of government, business, science. Below that level of prestige, the cost-benefit analysis gets tougher. If I had to pay $100k a year at Rutgers, I'd pass.
If I was a seventeen year old today, I'd live with my folks (live under their roof, eat their food, use their washing machine), save money, attend community college for two years, and then go to the best state school I could get into. My eventual diploma would say "UVA" (or "JMU" or "Va Tech") where I had finished, not "Blue Ridge Community College" where I had begun.
That's what I did in the 1990's. It was a great decision. I had $4,000 dollars in debt when I graduated. I then paid for master's with cash a few years later. It took me longer to complete the program because I took the classes at a slower pace so I could pay cash, but I walked out with a master's and no debt. The cost for young people now is outrageous.

I started a 529 for my daughter when she was born and she will have plenty of money for any state school she wants to attend for a bachelor's, but only because I started early and have consistently put money into it.
 
That's what I did in the 1990's. It was a great decision. I had $4,000 dollars in debt when I graduated. I then paid for master's with cash a few years later. It took me longer to complete the program because I took the classes at a slower pace so I could pay cash, but I walked out with a master's and no debt. The cost for young people now is outrageous.

I started a 529 for my daughter when she was born and she will have plenty of money for any state school she wants to attend for a bachelor's, but only because I started early and have consistently put money into it.
Virginia has a program that, if a student attends a Virginia community college and earns a certain GPA, he/she gets automatic admission to various state universities. Earn a 3.6? Go to UVA. Earn a 3.4, go to Va Tech. Earn a 3.2? Get into JMU. It is a pretty smart program. major public universities get college-tested students. Students get to earn their way into top public universities.
 
Florida Trident (Florida Center for Government Accountability)

Charter School Queen: How an elected official is cashing in big on a publicly funded school​


Clay County’s public schools have eliminated teaching positions and cut student busing services due to a budget deficit. School officials are now asking homeowners to shoulder higher property taxes to make up the difference.

Yet while the system struggles, one of the county’s elected leaders has quietly turned one public charter school into a private windfall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads