The Aggies and Mizzou are both playing .500 ball this year. Can someone tell me again how this improved the SEC? Will these teams really increase overall tv revenue for the league?
I'll start with the whole playing .500 ball thing. Firstly, according to Sagarin, Missouri has the most difficult schedule in the nation. Now, I don't agree with that but I do agree they've had a very difficult schedule. As to A&M, they lost by one point to Oklahoma St. and 4 points to Arkansas. Clearly, they are better than their record indicates (which might be why Sangarin has them in the top ten, once again don't agree with that but it's an indication).
Having said that, would we prefer Oklahoma? The SEC West has 3 of the top 6 BCS teams, it's so nuts that we're debating three way tie scenarios and scenarios in which the #3 team in the BCS might not go to a BCS bowl game. But yeah, we don't want these top 30 attendance, competitive teams, we need the SEC West to have 4 of the top 6 BCS teams because that's just the standard the SEC holds! Well, much like the fact that someone has to lose in the Big 12, if Oklahoma was in the west one of those teams would have at least two losses, and that's just all there is to it.
Finally, the SEC gains significantly by adding Missouri and Texas A&M. I can start with the fact that both are top 30 in football attendance. People can try to knock the programs, but for instance Missouri has better attendance than Miami, Georgia Tech, and West Virginia. When you are talking about a 14 team conference out of 120 teams, top 30 attendance is cherry picking. Secondly, both come from a state with large populations. Texas in particular is great because of the number of recruits they produce, and Missouri is great because of two major markets, and the fact that Missouri is the only D1 program in the state.
So, what does the SEC gain? Well, they get two good, well supported football programs, but not quite murderous Oklahoma level programs (not a bad thing, the SEC has enough of that). They gain a foothold into some fantastic TV markets, so everyone gets richer. And finally, they gain traction into areas that are full of recruits. So, to summarize the SEC retains the current level of football support without really destroying the balance, they get richer, and the SEC coaches have more fertile recruiting territory.
Texas has over 50,000 more kids playing high school football than the second place state. Missouri, at 23,000 playing high school football has more than every SEC state but Texas, Florida, and Georgia. Simply put, as a pair Texas A&M and Missouri might be the best possible additions the SEC could have made.