More AU Crap

Status
Not open for further replies.

PinsonTider

Scout Team
Sep 19, 2005
111
0
0
52
Pinson, ALABAMA
I came across this posting from a Auburn fan on a Duck Hunters board I am a member of. Just wanted to see what y'all thought about this. I can't believe that this idiot would go to all the trouble of looking all this up just to try and justify their loss on Saturday.

Keep claiming 12 when you really just have 6

I just wanted to clear up a few misconceptions about Alabama's claim to 12 national championships based on fact rather than bias. Credit is given where credit is due.
To clear up confusion, the word retroactive means they went back in time to award the championship.

'TWELVE' national championships is fraudulent, nothing but pure bunk ginned up by the SID Department. Here's a rundown:

1925 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with Dartmouth. Who awarded the NC? Houlgate and Helms. Houlgate started his system in 1927. So Bama won their 1925 NC using a formula that didn't exist until 1927? Helms Athletic Foundation started in 1941. Another incredible retroactive NC.

The Associated Press Poll has been active since 1936. The AP took their final poll prior to bowl games from 1936 - 1964 and in 1966 and 1967. They took their final poll after the bowl games in 1965 and from 1968 - Current.

1926 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with 3 other teams with equal or better records! Once again it is the Helms Athletic Foundation in 1941 that awards it!

1930 National Championship- The Davis poll says that Bama tied Notre Dame for NC this year. This was the only one to award it to Bama. Notre Dame was named NC in 6 polls! Parke Davis is another retroactive system! He (an individual, not an organization) did his in 1933!

1934 National Championship- Alabama says they share this with two other teams. The awarders are Dunkel, Williamson, and Football Thesaurus. Dunkel was an individual who came up with his own system. Williamson was a geologist who came up with his own system. Football Thesaurus first appeared in 1946!

1941 National Championship- This is a complete joke. The AP ranked Alabama 20th in the nation with 14 teams with better records in the top 20. Once again it is the Football Thesaurus that retroactively awards it. Alabama finished 3rd in the SEC that year. Mississippi State won the SEC title..yet Bama claims a National title!

1961 National Championship- Finally a legitimate NC. .

1964 National Championship- While the AP did award the NC to Bama (10-1-0), Arkansas had the better record, 11-0. Alabama played Texas in their bowl and LOST. The AP final poll was before the bowl.

1965 National Championship- The AP gave this to Bama. That year there were three teams with better records than Bama. Bama 9-1-1, Michigan St 10-1-0, Arkansas 10-1-0, Nebraska 10-1-0.

1973 National Championship- AP puts Bama 4th after their bowl game loss. Bama claims a NC from the UPI poll that was taken before they met Notre Dame in the bowl game and lost. There were 3 teams with better records than Bama that year. The embarrassment of naming Alabama number one caused the UPI to name champions after bowl games. Yet Bammer has no shame in claiming it of course.

1978 National Championship- AP gives this to Alabama(11-1-0) even though USC (12-1-0) had the better record Guess who Alabama lost to that year? USC!!!!!!!!!. UPI gave the NC to USC.

1979 National Championship- Their second legitimate NC. Their first Unanimous NC.

1992 National Championship- Their third legitimate NC. Their second Unanimous NC.

You can see why people ridicule Bama fans when they talk about 12 NCs. The early ones were awarded by individuals years after the games were played. These weren't consensus polls but NCs awarded by people that had their own formula for determining champions. Some NCs were given before bowl games that Bama lost. Using Alabama logic, Auburn could claim four national championships. But when Bammers brag they like to say they have twelve and Auburn has one. How silly. The NCAA recognizes 6 NCs for Bama and there are only two NCs that Bama has unanimously. You can't find an Auburn site claiming four national championships but there are plenty Bama sites claiming twelve.Debunking the Alabama National Championship myths.

At the same time, Auburn could claim at 5 national titles using the Bammer methods.

1913- Auburn went 8-0 and claimed the NC in the Billingsley Poll.

1957-AP national Champions.

1983-Auburn went 11-1, played the nation's toughest schedule, and won the national title in The New York Times, Sagarin, Billingsley, Rothman and College Football Researchers Association

1993-Auburn went 11-0 and won the national title by the National Championship Foundation .

2004- Auburn became only the second team in SEC history to go 13-0. Auburn even beat SEC East champion Tennessee twice. Auburn was awarded the national title by the first People's National Championship Poll, Golf Digest, and The Eufaula Times.

AUBURN only claims the 1957 national title. HOWEVER..IF Alabama can claim some of the ones that they claim, we have ever right to claim the ones above.

Bama...legends in their own minds!

References:

http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/ia_fo...st_champs.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
 
Dang, I guess we can't argue with that. I mean, if the Eufala times and Golf Digest REALLY awarded them the NC it MUST be legit. Come on noobs...give me a break. And since when did AUB fans learn to read good enough to pick up the New York Times???
 
Okay, go back to his board and say this. If that is true Auburn University has NEVER won a National Championship. Look it up! they haven't won one. Alabama Polytechnic Institute won one but Auburn hasn't won diddly squat. Auburn wasn't a school until 1959 or something like that...before that it was API. This argument has about as much merit as his! Also see Bamafan1961's response but change the name to API! Awdarn wasn't on probation API was.

Also, for the record the NCAA (not Alabama) credits us with 18 national titles...we only claim 12.

Or better yet tell him WHO CARES...whatever the number it kicks his teams arse whether 6, 12 or 18 times.

Also, I don't know his age but I'll bet he's been alive for most of Bama's and NONE of Awdarn's which must be very upsetting to his toomers rolling butt! Oh wait, they lost to USF...no toomers rolling this weekend.
 
Okay, go back to his board and say this. If that is true Auburn University has NEVER won a National Championship. Look it up! they haven't won one. Alabama Polytechnic Institute won one but Auburn hasn't won diddly squat. Auburn wasn't a school until 1959 or something like that...before that it was API. This argument has about as much merit as his! Also see Bamafan1961's response but change the name to API! Awdarn wasn't on probation API was.

Also, for the record the NCAA (not Alabama) credits us with 18 national titles...we only claim 12.

Or better yet tell him WHO CARES...whatever the number it kicks his teams arse whether 6, 12 or 18 times.

Also, I don't know his age but I'll bet he's been alive for most of Bama's and NONE of Awdarn's which must be very upsetting to his toomers rolling butt! Oh wait, they lost to USF...no toomers rolling this weekend.

I bet the trees will be saved a Toomers Corner this year from the lack of toilet paper covering them. :biggrin2:
 
As much as I hate to say it, that post does bring up good points. Especially 1941. I'm almost embarrassed we claim that. I guess there's no way to really say which polls are and aren't legit. However, and I've said this before on here, sometimes I wish we just claimed the UPI and AP championships since those seem to be the "true" awarding polls. Teams like the 1925 Rose Bowl team deserve all the credit in the world. I'm just not crazy on retroactively going back and claiming a championship. I know other do it such as USC, ND, and Ga. Tech, but we always seem to be the ones that get pointed at. It was never really an issue for me until I went to OU and they claimed only AP championships so it got me thinking about ours. Oh well, flame away at me.
 
Haha, thats not even worth responding too. I guess it's Alabama's fault for there not being a legitimate rating system in early college football. Why would you even want to argue this if were a Booger fan? It would only remind you of how mediocre your team has been its entire existence. The only time they have been good is when they have cheated (57,93) or when Alabama has been awful (57, 2004 (Probation))... Way to go Eufala Champs!! Keep making fake National Champion Rings, it gives Alabama fans something to laugh about.
 
After a very heavy dinner , that almost put me to sleep . :p_blank:
 
I came across this posting from a Auburn fan on a Duck Hunters board I am a member of.

Glad to see I'm not the only Fuger on this board. I almost went off on this Barner over there but anybody that probably spent 9 hours pecking his way on a computer to type that garbage gets a free pass. However, I do love the response that any amount of NC's we have smokes theirs.
 
Dang, I guess we can't argue with that. I mean, if the Eufala times and Golf Digest REALLY awarded them the NC it MUST be legit. Come on noobs...give me a break. And since when did AUB fans learn to read good enough to pick up the New York Times???

That bunch knew something was up when an Alabama Grad broke the story on their stellar reading course. :biggrin:
 
As much as I hate to say it, that post does bring up good points. Especially 1941. I'm almost embarrassed we claim that. I guess there's no way to really say which polls are and aren't legit. However, and I've said this before on here, sometimes I wish we just claimed the UPI and AP championships since those seem to be the "true" awarding polls. Teams like the 1925 Rose Bowl team deserve all the credit in the world. I'm just not crazy on retroactively going back and claiming a championship. I know other do it such as USC, ND, and Ga. Tech, but we always seem to be the ones that get pointed at. It was never really an issue for me until I went to OU and they claimed only AP championships so it got me thinking about ours. Oh well, flame away at me.

I'll give up the '41 if you give us the '45 war babies!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads